User talk:Casmith 789/Archive 2006 to 2007

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Casmith 789. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

The history of this page can be found on User talk:Casmith 789.

One month here and no welcome message yet!! Here's one from me:

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! -- Lost ^(talk) 10:11, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice! -- Casmith 789 10:16, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

KGAB

Thank You for fixing the little error on KGAB Good Day to you Ekulwyo 17:03, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

RFA thanks

Thanks so much for your support on my RFA, which closed successfully this morning with a result of (64/3/3). I will be stepping lightly at first trying to make sure I don't mess up too badly using the tools. Any further advice/guidance will be gratefully accepted. I hope I will live up to your trust! NawlinWiki 12:03, 26 August 2006 (UTC) talk contribs

Your recent edits

Hi! I think we're patrolling new pages together this morning (or afternoon where you are!). You've tagged a few articles for clean-up that really should have been either deleted or redirected; e.g., an article about a seventh grade boy that lists his best friends and the sports he plays. You're right in deducing the article needs clean-up (it was poorly formatted), but the article shouldn't be on Wikipedia at all. Perhaps you would like to carefully review the criteria for speedy deletion, and then make sure that you read the article carefully before tagging it. Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better! Happy editing! -- Merope 14:49, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

I completely understand. Just remember that it's a learning process and we all make mistakes. As for being nervous about speedying something, you can also use a {{prod}} tag, which proposes deletion but can be removed by anyone who contests it. You can read about it here. Cheers! -- Merope 15:16, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

just wonderin conor noble is an important person

Gleason's theorem

I noticed that you tagged the article Gleason's theorem as nonsense. In fact, it's complicated mathematics, but it isn't nonsense. The speedy tag has been removed. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 14:19, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Winhunter's RfA thanks

Hi Casmith_789, thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which was closed as successful today with a finaly tally of (56/0/3). I will be very careful at first to avoid any mistakes. Please feel free to leave a message in my talk page if you have any comments/suggestions about me in the future. Once again, thank you! --WinHunter ^(talk) 09:08, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

about Science Citation Index

hi, I noticed that you put Science Citation Index as speedy deletion. I don't know why. If it is a stub, you can add a template of stub. Many versions of Wikipedia have this article. I don't see any reason to put it into speedy deletion. And I will expand it. Please cool down. Thanks.--Neo-Jay 12:09, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Many thanks for your removing the speedy deletion tag. --Neo-Jay 12:40, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

ACS Beirut

Hi, I am creating an article on ACS Beirut, but it is not finished yet, and it would be much appreciated if you did not add a speedy deletion tag on it until it is finished

thanks :)

o and sorry about deleting it - i didn't know what the piece of code at the top was...

Dear Sir, or Dear Madam, or Dear Deer

How come you don't believe that Dear deserves at the very least--Disambiguation. May I be Personal with you? Have you ever written or receive a "Dear John letter"? PS: On this, do you get the Humor? Yours truly, Ludvikus 14:36, 5 September 2006 (UTC) And by the way, don't you think that "Yours truly," needs Disambiguation from "Your Truly"?

Yours truly, Ludvikus 15:04, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

JPD's RfA

Thanks, Casmith, for your support at my RfA, which finished with a tally of 94/1/0. I hope I work as an administrator as admirably as you trusted. JPD (talk) 16:14, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Throttle 3

Hi, Throttle 3 is now at an AfD. Thanks, Lankybugger 19:20, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

For you

Hi there, you seem to have done a lot of patrolling ever since you got here. Here's a little something for you:

		The Exceptional Newcomer Award
		To Casmith 789, for great work on RC Patrol and stub sorting -- Lost^(talk) 13:45, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

I didn't mean to

Hey I wasn't creating a meaningless page, i just signed up to wikipedia, and thought that every user had they're own page so that people could contact them. My apologies for the confusion

ETod09 08 September 06

Could you explain

sorry about that, I just signed up so im kinda confused, is they're a user page that I can create? Or do i just type in ETod09 into the search box and go from there, im not to sure since it says that im gonna get deleted or whatnot wherever i go. Can you explain how i can create a user page without creating an idividual article about myself?

ETod09 03:17 8 September 06

Thank you

Thanks for the info, one more thing could you tell me how everyone has the date time, and UTC after their names when they site they're name? And what does UTC mean?

ETod09 07:47, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

If i wanted to create a table of contents, like you for example how would I go about doing that? ETod09 07:47, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

VIDYA - an ngo

Can you elaborate as to why the POV is disputed on VIDYA - an ngo? -- Ratarsed 09:37, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

When I put the NPOV tag on I felt that you were saying that the program always helped children and now someone has fixed that by saying the program is intended to help. It was only minor. -- Casmith 789 08:30, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Victorian-rail-stub

please stop changing articles listed at victoria-rail-stubs to stubs. im arranging them into a category to make it easier for other people with knowledge on them to be able to find and edit them, thank you --Dan027 15:19, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: Bands

Hey there, Thanks for the message on my page, I went ahead and expanded the article and now have it contested for deletion. If you could take a look and see what you think. --Thefirechild 15:54, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Casmith 789

Thank you for supporting my recent RfA. It finished with an amazing final tally of 160/4/1. I really appreciate your support. Cheers, Sarah Ewart (Talk) 05:22, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Hello and Thanks

Hi - I'm Nimue. Just as you were putting on the stub for Oracle's Queen, I just finished typing the summary. Another case where the edits trip over each other! Anyway, just wanted to thank you for being so quick to notice that new article.

Regards and happy editing, Lady Nimue of the Lake 07:22, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

List of basic robotics topics

Okay, it's expanded. Was that fast enough for you? :-) --The Transhumanist 09:46, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi Casmith 789, thanks a lot for the userboxes. I am still on a wikibreak and only editing intermittently. Will put up the userboxes in the respective project pages once I am fully online -- Lost^(talk) 08:55, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which passed with a tally of 66/11/5. I learned quite a bit during the process, and I expect to be learning a lot more in the days ahead. I will be taking things slowly (and doing a lot of re-reading), but I hope you will let me know if there is anything I can do to improve in my new capacity. -- Merope ^Talk 13:39, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

CSD

Hi Casmith. Regarding your AfD nom for Luke Wakefield, if you see anything like that in future just go ahead and add the {{db-bio}} tag. The article has been speedily deleted. Thanks, Deizio talk 12:21, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Re:Your tools on the edit counter

I've now fixed the hover-tips to be more generic. (For technical reasons, it's easiest to make them the same.) --ais523 12:25, 24 October 2006 (U T C)

Hello

Hello there. You should help make our school page more non-offensive. "Neutral", if you will. It is here. Alex Holowczak 17:34, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Userboxes

Hi Casmith, I just added the userboxes made by you to my page. But the alignment has become a bit crooked. Can you please check and advise. Thanks -- Lost^(talk) 09:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes they are ok now. Thanks -- Lost^(talk) 08:23, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Hey thanks... Stupid of me:) -- Lost^(talk) 08:27, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi again Casmith, thanks a lot for your wonderful words on my recently concluded RFA. I have found you to be very willing to help and doing lots of gnome work. Thanks again... Do let me know if I can assist with anything -- Lost^(talk) 17:47, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Michael Solomon Alexander

Give me a chance - I was in mid-creation!--R613vlu 12:57, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Basic lists

Don't worry, I'll be working on these a lot. Oh, and thank you for having faith in me, I appreciate that. By the way, here's a project you might be interested in: User:The Transhumanist/Virtual classroom; take a look and let me know what you think. I built it while taking a break from the list project. The Transhumanist 16:10, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Stubs

Hello,

Thank you for your stub submission. You may wish to note that it is preferable to use a stub template from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types instead of using simply {{stub}}, if you can.

Thanks! Ksbrown 18:22, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

You've got a reply at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/The Transhumanist (eom)

The Transhumanist 09:09, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Crawfordknights

I have noticed that you have closed this RfA attempt early. However, it says it was closed on the 10th December, when it is the 9th today. Could you please clarify this? -- Casmith 789 09:58, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

My mistake, now corrected. Thanks for picking that one up for me! (aeropagitica) 13:13, 9 December 2006 (UTC)