User talk:Caseyph

Incidents noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Caseyph and QAnon. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 07:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 07:47, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

At best, you are continuing to edit war over your insertion of original research at QAnon, an article under discretionary sanctions, after being warned. And you are doing so incredibly disruptively, somehow unintentionally implementing sweeping changes/reversions of large amounts of content over your attempts to change a single word, and then apparently denying or somehow not even realizing that you are doing so, in spite of diffs being provided to you directly. I'm assuming this is the case in good faith, because the alternative explanation is that you're either intentionally making large changes and then lying about it, or that your account is compromised. Either way, giving you the best possible benefit of the doubt, your conduct is falling fall short of our basic expectations of minimal competence. Thus you have been blocked indefinitely. First we need to figure out what is going on here with the mass changes that you're denying you've made, why this is happening and what we need to do to avoid this from happening going forward. Then we can address the edit warring and POV-pushing. We have a lot to sort through so I encourage you to start thinking about how you can address these issues. ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 07:58, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

~Swarm~ ^{sting} 08:02, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]