User talk:Cartinal

Welcome...

Hello, Cartinal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Mario1987 (talk) 19:28, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cartinal

I have deleted the page Cartinal, since it had no useful encyclopedic content. I suppose you perhaps intended to create User:Cartinal instead. You are free to do so of course. Fram (talk) 14:39, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes thanks, I haven't read your comment, I'm sorry. But now, already since a longer time, you can visit my site in german, french and spanish, have fun.--Cartinal (talk) 19:59, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Marxist theory

Hallo, you may have a look at the Template:Marxist theory. There is an edit-conflict going on for over a year about who to include into the pepople section. In the current situation,

a single user wants to include Joseph Stalin, Mao Zedong and Kim Il Sung, and exclude Frankfurt School.
an IP (and before User:Inbloom2) want to remove the three names of Stalin, Mao and Kim.
I agree to include Mao and Stalin, but want to remove Kim and keep Frankfurt School.

Unfortunately, the first mentioned user who wants to include Kim and remove Frankfurt School does not communicate with me in revision-comments or on the template's talk. Perhaps you have an opinion?

Greetings, --Schwalker (talk) 09:39, 18 April 2009 (UTC) (de:User:Rosenkohl)[reply]

Ist deutsch auch ok für dich? :D ich wäre dafür einfach alles einzuschreiben, immerhin ist Juche ja leider auch eine Spielart des kommunismus ich werds mir mal kurz anschauen, aber kümmer dich auch um de:Portal:Marxismus ;) Mfg--Cartinal (talk) 20:36, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, for me German ist ok, however Wikipedia:Talk#Good practices suggests the use of English language on en.wikipdedia talk pages. The intention of my request here was to keep the process transparent, and to draw a wider public attention on the template.

It may be correct to call Juche a variation of communism. Please note however, that the template is not about "communism", but "marxist theory". Further, the section of the template, where the edit-conflict takes place ist not about "ideologies" but about "people". So while Juche may be a communist theory or ideology, it is not marxist, and it is not a theorist.

Ich würde mich gerne um das de:Portal:Marxismus kümmern. Es macht in vielen Teilen den Eindruck, daß sich lange niemand mehr damit beschäftigt hat, in vielen der auf aktuellem Stand gehaltenen Portalen gibt es einen oder mehrere Benutzer, die sich regelmäßig darum kümmern. Mal sehen, ob ich oder andere dazu Lust finden, wenigstens ein kleines bischen auf Aktualität in de:Portal:Marxismus zu achten.

Herzlichen Gruß, --Schwalker (talk) 09:07, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thats rigth, I forgot, that our english friends could be interested in our talk :), Juche is defined, as a kind of marxism-leninism (german wikipedai, the english article had been too long for me, at 01:14), however stalinism and maoism base even stronger on marxism, I think it's no problem to link them as well on the article about marxist theory. --Cartinal (talk) 23:16, 24 April 2009 (UTC) P.S. am Tag der Arbeit Marxismusportaltreffen im IRC? Ich hoffe auf dich[reply]

Ulrich Rippert

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Ulrich Rippert. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:20, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Cartinal! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Francis Tombs, Baron Tombs - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:08, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Laguna de Santa Rosa vs Mark West Creek

The identity of the waterway from the MWC confluence to the Russian River confluence is debatable. If you look at any USGS topo map, you will find it labeled "Mark West Creek." A local organization called the Laguna Foundation attempted to redefine the waterway in 1988, presumably to increase the organization's scope of influence. I tend to think that the USGS is less biased, so I've followed USGS's definition of the Laguna. If you can cite an unbiased source, please don't leave the change half-done. Cite your sources and also update the related articles Mark West Creek and Russian River (California). --Stepheng3 (talk) 23:41, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, but i don't know anything about the laguna, i've seen it because i try to translate the article into german at the moment. i thought that the mentioned russian river must be the one in california. If this edit had been wrong feel free to delete it. greetings --Cartinal (talk) 22:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, your edit was fine. It turns out I had your edit confused with that of 24.130.51.201. My mistake. I'm very sorry to have directed my rant at the wrong person. I'll try to be more careful in the future. --Stepheng3 (talk) 06:21, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, i know how to produce mistakes, but i'm used to produce more serious ones :) --Cartinal (talk) 11:33, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Francis Tombs, Baron Tombs

The article Francis Tombs, Baron Tombs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable person, fails WP:NOTE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 02:39, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Francis Tombs, Baron Tombs

I have nominated Francis Tombs, Baron Tombs, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Tombs, Baron Tombs. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 04:38, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

René Wilke moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, René Wilke, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 02:58, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I added some sources and think it should be enough now. i would be glad if you could review the article and am looking forward for your feedback. Best regards --Cartinal (talk) 19:34, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good! Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 00:54, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: René Wilke has been accepted

René Wilke, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 00:57, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cartinal. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]