User talk:Carterclewis

Carterclewis, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Carterclewis! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

You didn't get a response to your question about family trees, and I wouldn't know how. Perhaps you should ask again. Yes, I know it was asked a long time ago. I'm having a hard time catching up.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:00, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Number Lab (pioneering athleisure brand) (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ProgrammingGeek was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Number Lab (pioneering athleisure brand) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ProgrammingGeek^talktome 13:48, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Number Lab (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There were a few improvements since the last decline, but there where even more areas where it's actually worse. "Early athleisure pioneer" I didn't see any sources that claim Number Lab was a "pioneer", it's a pretty grand claim to make. Btw, I moved the page from it's original name for much the same reasons.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Number Lab and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 02:12, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Number Lab concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Number Lab, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Number Lab has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Number Lab. Thanks! Dial911 (talk) 16:39, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Number Lab has been accepted

Number Lab, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 10:05, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fictionz (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TipsyElephant was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources barely even mention Fictionz. The sources must have in depth coverage of the company to pass WP:NCORP. TipsyElephant (talk) 17:21, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fictionz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TipsyElephant (talk) 17:21, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fictionz

Hello, Carterclewis. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fictionz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:49, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft moved

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:John Oliver (minister). This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Bobby Cohn (talk) 21:44, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Much appreciated! Carterclewis (talk) 22:08, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:John Oliver (minister) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Oliver (minister). Thanks! OhHaiMark (talk) 19:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi OhHaiMark - thanks for the comment. looking forward to making the suggested edits, but need a little more clarity on what types of information should be deleted from his descendants? wasn't quite sure. thanks again! Carterclewis (talk) 19:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Practically everything. This article is about him, not his descendants. Take the info that you included about his descendants and add it to those articles instead. OhHaiMark (talk) 19:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

got it. will do. thanks Carterclewis (talk) 19:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi OhHaiMark - i delete most of the information. Was this aligned with your suggestion? Thx Carterclewis (talk) 12:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Oliver (minister) has been accepted

John Oliver (minister), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 12:55, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]