User talk:CarsonsDad

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, CarsonsDad! I am Thesavagenorwegian and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

TheSavage Norwegian 01:29, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cool!

Hey, that's awesome! You're one of the only users that responded to my welcome. If you have any questions, just ask. I might not have the answer, but I'll try to help as best as I can.

PS. I didn't actually type up that welcome myself, I used an amazing program called friendly to do it.

Happy editing!

TheSavage Norwegian 02:32, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikify

To quote the Wikipedia:Glossary wikification is

Wikify, wfy, wikiize, wiki-ise, etc.

To format using Wiki markup (as opposed to plain text or HTML) and add internal links to material, incorporating it into the whole of Wikipedia. Noun: wikification; gerund: wikifying. See also Wikipedia:How to edit a page, Category:Articles that need to be wikified, Wikipedia:Guide to layout and Wikipedia:Make only links relevant to the context.

So your changes probably need clarification my adding links into the text. For example, when you left that message about Orexin, just put two brackets around it like this: [[Orexin]] and the link will send you to that page. But what if it's plural, like Orexins? Then put a line between the two words; the one that you want it to say, and the one you want to direct it to, like this: [[Orexin|Orexins]]

By the way: I spent all day yesterday on Wikipedia, but I don't do nights. That's when I have dreams about wikipedia.

PPS: Are you related to Carson?

TheSavage Norwegian 19:59, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're doing great!

Thesavagenorwegian has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

You certainly know your stuff, so be bold and edit away!

By the way, you're signature can go wherever you want it to go, like right after the message. TheSavage Norwegian 22:24, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orexin

Welcome and thanks for your addition to the orexin article. Please don't hesitate to further modify my edits. Sometimes I tend to over simplify things. Accuracy is of paramount importance and if I slip up, please correct it. Cheers. Boghog2 (talk) 19:15, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hypocretin

Thank you, sir! I have 2 questions...

1. Has the Orexin/Hypocretin naming cleavage been resolved? It seems to me the "brain guys" prefer hypocretin, but I am looking at the tip of the iceberg.

2. Is there any particular trigger that causes an entire section to be rewritten or is it just when someone takes a notion? As I told TSN, I can see that entire sections (If not entire articles!) need to be rewritten from time to time. As a newbee, I would not be so brash as to undertake that task. At least not until next week! ;-) CarsonsDad (talk) 15:50, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Concerning your first question, the short answer appears to be no. Orexin and hypocretin are of course synonyms for the same gene/protein. While I am not an expert on this gene/protein, hypocretin (HCRT) is the perferred HUGO gene name and orexin (O43612) is the preferred protein name. Concerning your second question and my edits to the orexin article, I was being bold (and so should you!). I did make some major changes to the text you added that were meant to make the text sound less like a press release and more encyclopedic. In particular, the WP:MEDMOS guideline states:

Do not hype a study by listing the names, credentials, institutions, or other "qualifications" of their authors. The text of the article should not needlessly duplicate the names, dates, titles, and other information about the source that you list in the citation.

The exception to this rule is perhaps a history section which list the original discovery and key events (e.g., Nobel prizes) in the development of the subject. Cheers. Boghog2 (talk) 22:06, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply and please do not feel that Q2 was in any way related to the changes you made to my "precious" paragraph. I assure you that my tongue was firmly in cheek when I chose to use that adjective in my note to TSN, if you happened to see that.

Actually, Q2 is a "big picture" question. Taking our focus to a different article, I see that the narcolepsy article is clearly in need of wikification and, IMHO, needs to be rewritten in places because it is somewhat disjointed. I'm not critizing anyone over this, only observing that, as time goes by and edits pile up, there comes a point when an article, or certainly parts of it, need to be reworked. If I correctly understand your advice to be bold, you mean that anyone is welcome to have at it. CarsonsDad (talk) 00:11, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Boghog2"

Please go ahead and edit the narcolepsy article. Having a large number of editors is both a strength and weakness. The masses can spot and correct errors, but articles can often lose cohesiveness with many contributors. Often what is required is a single dedicated editor whip an article back into shape. So please, if you have the time, "have at it"! Boghog2 (talk) 19:44, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Dagmar Midcap d2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dagmar Midcap d2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:36, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Narcolepsy

As a narcoleptic myself, here is my first attempt... :-(( CarsonsDad (talk) 00:08, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Narcolepsy is a neurological condition characteri zzzzzz ed by sudden and earr resistable attaxxx of day thyme sleppiness (yawn)

                     Oh, sorry, what was I saying?  Oh, yes... sleepiness, also nown as EDS. A narcoleptic will most
likely experience disturbeddd ...(yawn)...

Sorry about that, I wasn't paying attention there for a moment.  As I was saying, disturbed nocturnal sleep,
which is often confused with insomnia, and disordered REM or rapppid eyyeee movvvveeemeennt sleep. (yawn)

In edition, microsleep is zzzz  also zzzz  quite zzzz  common zzzz  in zzzz  marcoleptix zzzz.  Marcolepsy
issssss ssss sssss sss sssss ss s s s s

Oh! Yes! It is one of the dyssomnias.  The term was created by Dr. Jean-Baptiste-Édouard Gélineau (1859-1928)
after a severe bout of French fatigue.

This article sporked from the uncyclopedia

Just a comment (since I am here at your page anyway): The reason for the odd configuration of these comments (which made me laughzzzzzzz....) is that there is a space at the beginning of the sentence. Delete that space and they will go back to normal Wikipedia layout. --MelanieN (talk) 14:53, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Need help with detailed content about Atlanta

We desperately need opinions and input as to how to organize the detailed content on Atlanta topics, see Talk:Culture_of_Atlanta#Where_should_topic_detail_go.3F Keizers (talk) 22:03, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pink slime

Hi, CarsonsDad, and thanks for your contributions to the article Pink slime. Just a comment about the recent little "edit war" over whether or not to mention political contributions by the founder of BPI. I objected to including that information at first, finding it irrelevant, and you later deleted the information several times. Please note that you should NOT delete it again; you could be blocked for violating Wikipedia's three-revert rule intended to avoid edit wars. There is a discussion about the subject on the talk page, and I have accepted the current version, which puts the contributions into context and does not mention Romney or anyone else who is not part of this story. I hope you will accept this version as well, and in any case I urge you not to remove the information yourself because of the three-revert rule. Discuss it at the talk page if you still have issues. Thanks! --MelanieN (talk) 14:50, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm cool. WolverineLawyer ( aka Mr. Politico ) and Scopecreep acted as a tag-team in that little flurry and each of them reverted twice. The numbers were against me. CarsonsDad (talk) 07:37, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Help Survey

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 17:33, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, CarsonsDad. You have new messages at Talk:Hypersomnia#Edit_disagreement.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

All is well! CarsonsDad (talk) 04:50, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Idiopathic hypersomnia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. CarsonsDad (talk) 04:41, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, CarsonsDad. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, CarsonsDad. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CarsonsDad. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]