User talk:Carrots862

December 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Phlegm. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. theinstantmatrix (talk) 16:48, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Phlegm.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. theinstantmatrix (talk) 16:50, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Toilet roll holder.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Toilet roll holder was changed by Carrots862 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964441 on 2017-12-06T16:53:54+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:53, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. -- ferret (talk) 19:26, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please can I get unblocked? Carrots862 (talk) 05:54, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was only removing images that are to be viewed by people aged 18 and over! I was trying to help keep Wikipedia a safe website! Carrots862 (talk) 05:55, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removing innapropriate images

I was only removing images that were disgusting! Carrots862 (talk) 00:49, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note to any admin that might review an unblock request for this user, the statements they are making about inappropriate images is a hallmark behavior for this sockmaster. See the contributions of other suspected socks in relation to various porn website articles. -- ferret (talk) 03:56, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can I get unblocked?! Carrots862 (talk) 01:13, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Follow the instructions in the block notice to request unblock. -- ferret (talk) 02:19, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Carrots862 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20054 was submitted on Dec 14, 2017 04:48:04. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 04:48, 14 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Carrots862 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20063 was submitted on Dec 15, 2017 01:05:25. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 01:05, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Carrots862 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was just removing images that are not suitable for anyone!

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:06, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Carrots862 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason I was blocked is because I was apparently “vandalising articles” I wasn’t, but I understand why, I was editing too often, if I’m unblocked I won’t keep editing Carrots862 (talk) 22:44, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were blocked for sock puppetry, not for vandalism. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:28, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Carrots862 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don’t know what sock puppet is! Can I get unblocked please, it’s been ages! Carrots862 (talk) 04:43, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

WP:SOCK. If you want to be unblocked you'll need to take the WP:STANDARDOFFER on your primary account. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:27, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Carrots862 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my primary account! I don’t get why I was blocked in the first place! Carrots862 (talk) 13:55, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account is blocked as a likely sock puppet account of User:Garran20 (based on behavioral evidence), and you would need to address that in any unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:50, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Carrots862 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

can I have this account deleted Carrots862 (talk) 20:13, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. And no, accounts technically cannot be deleted. Huon (talk) 20:38, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't think further evidence is needed but note that the other sock blocked at the same time, June1966, has made the same improper unblock requests, on the same dates and times, as Carrots862. -- ferret (talk) 14:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Carrots862 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So, can I be unblocked?!? I was doing nothing wrong! Carrots862 (talk) 02:12, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In order to be unblocked, you would need to have read, understood, and acted upon the information and procedures conveyed to you in the multiple declined unblock requests above. As this is now your fifth (sixth, if the one immediately above is counted) over the last week and a half and you have shown no indication of increasing clue, instead merely repeating the same denial of understanding why you were blocked, your ability to edit your talk page has been revoked. Further unblock requests, after you read and understand Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts, the fact Wikipedia is not censored, and the guide to requesting unblocks, should be made at your main account under the Standard Offer. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:42, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Carrots862 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20260 was submitted on Jan 08, 2018 22:30:41. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:30, 8 January 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Carrots862 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20539 was submitted on Feb 05, 2018 04:33:13. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 04:33, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]