User talk:CarrNayeli
This user is a student editor in University_of_Washington/Human_Reproductive_Ecology_(Fall) . |
CarrNayeli, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi CarrNayeli! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 7 October 2018 (UTC) |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, CarrNayeli, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:37, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Neal's Edits
[edit]the work you've done is very good. I would suggest adding a citation for the Likert test just for clarity. in addition to that, I think it would create a more complete dialogue on the topic if you used a few more sources in each of your sections. A simple grammatical correction would be that you don't need to cite the same source four times in the first section, I think it would be fine to site it just once. I did a quick search on PubMed for research about testosterone and competition and I found some articles that might be of interest. There are some articles about the role of testosterone in females as well, which could help with creating a discussion of testosterone's effects in multiple distinct populations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikieditor1017 (talk • contribs) 22:50, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Isis' response
[edit]Thank you for your edits, and thank you for your suggestions! I will look more into the Likert Scale and add a link to a wiki page if one exists. Also, I'll work on including more resources and fixing the citations that I have. Quick question: From your perspective, did the information seem neutral?