User talk:Carolleehilton

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page is already moved. I'm just closing out the request here. - GTBacchus^(talk) 02:23, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Carolleehilton → Mitchell Way – Would like, if possible, to request that this page be reviewed and if acceptable be moved in order that is it viewable to the main public. I believe I have followed guidelines as per online instructions for doing so. Any suggestions would be appreciated if you see need for improvement. THANKS!Carolleehilton (talk) 18:46, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment what page? Your requested source is a redlink. 70.49.127.194 (talk) 04:20, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

♠IDK what the problem is. I found it fine.

♠It has issues with sourcing, tho. The footnotes don't actually contain sources... Also, the "200 victories" claim needs a cite & clarification: is that in all formulae, just dwarfs, just Modifieds, or what?

♠It could also use help with the tone; it's a bit informal. It wants a little less breathless & a bit more detached. TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 23:00, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Articles that look like CSD candidates but aren't listed as such. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:49, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mitchell Way for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mitchell Way is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitchell Way until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 23:13, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]