User talk:Carolfrog

Welcome to my talk page. If you want to leave criticism or question my judgment, that's fine; communication is important. If you want to have a chat, point out good or funny articles or leave suggestions or compliments, that's even better. Please add new comment threads at the bottom of the page in a new section (click here). I'll reply on your talk page, copying what was said to keep things clear. Please sign your comments.

When replying to messages from me, I'd appreciate it if you either put the entire reply, or some sort of notification that you've replied, here on my talk page: sometimes I forget to watch, and a reply made only on your talk page might otherwise go unnoticed.

Archived talk pages: I haven't archived any talk pages yet. :)

Welcome!

Hello, Carolfrog, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 20:11, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Picture of the Year 2006

I, Carolfrog, assert that I have voted for: Picture 10, and that my IP address is currently 69.27.5.106. Thank you for recording my vote. Carolfrog 23:34, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Insulin?

Carol, I notice that you prodded the page on Actrapid. I don't see why, though - for instance, Google gives 291,000 hits for it. It certainly does exist as a brand name for insulin... what are you seeing wrong with it that I'm not? DS 01:03, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay. Yes, you might as well put it up for your very first AfD, considering that it's real and apparently was very widely used in its day. DS 01:24, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aab-e-gum

Carol. Thanks for the message. Well, Aab-e-Gum is not an arabic word. Its first portion is persian and second is urdu. Does not its name interesting? And yes it is famous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khalid Mahmood (talk • contribs) 15:55, 25 February 2007

Category: Aerospace expeditionary forces of the United States Air Force

Thanks for voicing your concerns over the *many* pages in the category. My rationale with making those pages was this: those wings/groups exist somewhere in the world; I find information on them in bits and pieces - when I find info, I put it in. These pages would be easier to create if they had a less convoluted existence (i.e. didn't fall under Prez Bush's *secret* war on terror). I would strongly recommend not changing them, since I am adding historical (pre-GWOT) information... but I don't control Wikipedia.TDRSS 22:12, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Example of completed AEF unit page

What I'm doing (albeit very slowly) is this: 455th Air Expeditionary Wing. The reason the templates are up is to have other "pitch in" bits and pieces of information, until I can get around to typing in the unit's historical information. The 455th AEW page is a perfect example.TDRSS 01:45, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that "blind or lazy" bit. I didn't mean for it to be taken personally. You were not the only source of my frustration and I was just letting off a bit of steam in the edit summary. I really should behave better than that. -MrFizyx 23:23, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the apology. The problem is, I really was being lazy. I saw that there was a badly formatted inline link in the text, and I was too lazy to click on it. But again, thanks for apologizing. :) —Carolfrog 23:27, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And I should behave better myself, and not be so sarcastic in deletion debates. :) —Carolfrog 23:38, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Faux Pause: Sources

Hello, as you had stated in the AFD Faux Pause entry, the article would need soruces. However, there was an article, specifically this one: http://www.xanfan.com/hotpotato/fauxpause.htm, HOWEVER, IIRC, the person said it WASN'T a source...but wouldn't it be a source? Xanfan is considered a trustworthy game show writer...his website is filled with true factual information. My question is, wouldn't it be a true source, then? Thanks. FamicomJL 04:19, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Xanfan source is technically a "source," but may not be considered to be a "reliable source" by most editors, according to the Wikipedia policy discussing reliable sources. If it was one source among many, it would be acceptable as a source for more information, but by itself it isn't enough to establish information. It looks like a blog website of some sort, and the attribution policy says this about that: "Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published . . . visiting a stranger's personal website is often the online equivalent of reading an unattributed flyer on a lamp post. For that reason, self-published material is largely not acceptable."

You might want to check into searching the Google News Archives (which is a new function that Google recently introduced) with a search something like this: [1]. That way, you don't have to rely on archived press releases from GSN (which, incidentally, would be self-published primary sources, not secondary sources). Of course, most of the archived articles you'll turn up will be behind subscription firewalls. That doesn't stop you from citing them, as long as you're sure that they do in fact confirm the information you think they do.

If you have sources in print form (books, newspapers, magazines), you can also cite those—Wikipedia doesn't rely entirely on web-based sources. See WP:CITE for instructions on how to do that correctly.

I hope this info helps. Let me know if you have any more questions. —Carolfrog 04:47, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's a great piece in TIME magazine that says to avoid it, I guess that'd be a good source, right? :) And, by looking at http://www.xanfan.com itself, you will see that it has information on multiple shows, with screenshots and video clips as well. I believe the TIME article and the Xanfan piece are both good sources. What is the best way to put sources in an article? Thank you. FamicomJL 19:28, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Salt lamps

Hi, we have both worked on getting the "salt lamp advertisement" out of wikipedia. I nominated the "article" and you mentioned a source in german. I gave it a first look and it basically covers salt that is sold in "new age" or "esoteric" shops with the claim to be mined in the himalaya. The author of the pdf claims that there are no salt mines in the himalaya region. Salt is gathered on open ground, at seashores for example, or imported from india. Lamps are never mentioned. She names a few persons involved with this salt trade. If you find that those persons are linked to salt lamps, or the salt lamp manufacturers claim their salt to be "himalayan" too, the source might be interesting for you. You can ask me for translating german to english, but I will have to check if I can find the time. Happy hunting. Cisz Helion 02:29, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your request on small newspapers/media notability

CF, I read your question on an AfD page about if there is a place in WP where the notability of small papers/media is addressed. I believe these fall under the area of Notability (organizations and companies) (which I get to via WP:CORP). Small papers/media are either orgs./cos. themselves, or products/subsidiaries of large orgs./cos (which the guideline also addresses). To save you the reading, the guideline is the same as others: the small paper/media must itself have been the subject of multiple independent secondary sources. Typically we find them in trade publications covering the industry. Hope this helps, comments welcome! PS love the userboxes, by the way. UnitedStatesian 18:09, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Faux Pause: Sources pt. II

Hello, I keep trying to put in the two sources, and it won't work, for some reason. What's the best and easiest way to add sources to an article? Thanks. Still a clueless newbie...FamicomJL 02:36, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I wasn't around to help the other day. It looks like you got it figured out, though. :) Let me know if you have any other questions, and I'll try to reply more promptly. ≈≈Carolfrog≈≈♦тос♦ 02:24, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Alright, thanks for being such a kind and big help! :) FamicomJL 13:53, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

I'll wear that star with pride! What was interesting in doing the web searching for that article was how often I was surprised by new information. That was a fun one. I still want to do a bit more work in it, but I really appreciate the star. Best, Noroton 16:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the rescue award

It was fun to rescue that article on chemical pond, which, of course, deserved an article; i appreciate your kind words to me. when i have time (sigh..) i would like to improve that article further. thanks for your positive efforts in fending off the ever-present negativity of some members of the community who don't have a clue about technology. best regards. Anlace 19:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Central Ohio Film Critics Association; Carl Franklin; Flesh for Frankenstein; Princess Albertina; James L. Snyder; Four Great Inventions of ancient China; Flesh (film); Genital play; National Society of Film Critics; Iowa Film Critics; Enterobacter; Hugh A. Robertson; Meissner's corpuscle; Holarchy; Billy Mays; Glans; The stopperage; Amigo Supermarkets; Brendan Moran

Cleanup: Multidrug resistance; Circumcision and law; Frenectomy
Merge: Lichen sclerosus; Thin-film optics; Criticism of Wal-Mart
Add Sources: Provo Utah Temple; Sex organ; Obstetrics
Wikify: Battōjutsu; Penncrest High School; Peter M. Zawadzki
Expand: Cai Lun; Beth Grant; Bear Lake (Idaho-Utah)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 14:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article on Black Racer deletion

Thanks for your informative and friendly response to my article. Perhaps Wikipedia is not the place for that particular article. As far as citing sources, the article was really the result of a lifetime of studying, photographing and teaching in the area of natural history. I tried to write a very basic introduction to a very common snake species—The Black Racer as found in Florida. All of the statements are really pretty close to "common knowledge" among people who study this snake. The photos were selected to illustrate the points. I suppose I could cite other sources for each statement but the facts are so basic and the real sources are my experience and observations. So as I said, maybe Wikipedia is not the place for the article as written and I would hope it would be simply deleted. I find it somewhat offensive (to my field, not me personally) that someone who obviously knew nothing about the subject was able to call its very existence into question. I went to some effort to harmlessly test the waters about Wikipedia before submitting a serious article. I was interested in seeing how difficult it would be to correct errors and misinformation. A few weeks back I encountered some very insulting things said about a very decent person (Nancy Zimpher, President of the University of Cincinnati) and I wasn't sure how long it took to remove those things or what steps could be used to bar someone from such activity. I was fairly well satisfied that there were safeguards in place but I was not prepared for an editor who has had several items published, to actually challenge the existence of a subject when it would have been so easy to check one of the sources I did list. This person didn't take ANY step to verify what s/he had to say. Thanks for your efforts...Neilnat — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neilnat (talk • contribs) 02:15, 21 March 2007

Thanks for your response. I appreciate your sentiment that "perhaps Wikipedia is not the place for [this] particular article." However, I feel I must again point out that whatever edits you have made to Wikipedia are licensed under the GDFL, and you cannot now withdraw the information you have added to the database. Your contributions to this particular article will make a good starting point for an encyclopedic and necessary Wikipedia article on the Black Racer. I understand that you feel that you provided a "basic introduction to a very common snake species" using "common knowledge" and your own "experience and observations." Unfortunately, on Wikipedia, we call that Original Research, and we don't allow it in the encyclopedia articles. So some reliable secondary sources will have to be found. I feel confident that they will be found. I hope that you will join in the search for sources and in the effort to improve the article. Thanks again. ≈≈Carolfrog≈≈♦тос♦ 02:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do I know you?

Hi Carolfrog,

Thanks again for that barnstar. Something just struck me. I used to know a Carol. She liked frogs. I think I still have one of her old business cards with a frog on it. Lived in -- I think it was Jersey City. Did some work for a credit card company. Beautiful woman with a vivacious personality. Had some of the same interests you have based on your suggestabox results. Hmmmmmmmm..... Noroton 04:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I'm the same Carol. Sorry. :) Thanks for wondering, though. ≈≈Carolfrog≈≈♦тос♦ 01:31, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Urethral Play

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Urethral Play, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Y not? 17:52, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Abasingammedda

Although I understand why you tagged this article for speedy deletion, we do generally consider most villages and towns to be notable - they're considered an exception to the normal notability guidelines. Not that you've done anything wrong - if the article had been on any other topic, you'd have been quite right to tag it as deletable. Drop me a note on my talk page if you need any help or advice about deletion policy. Walton^talk 19:45, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I completely understand that towns are an exception to the notability guidelines. Maybe we should note that on the notability page, for people like me who don't have a lot of experience with it. :)

I ran across this page while trying to help with the orphans, which are still being generated (at 1000 at a time) only into the As. This page has no links to it, and since it isn't that notable, I can't think of any way to create links to it. Is there a "List of Sri Lankan villages" page, or something? (Nope, I just checked—there is List_of_Sri_Lankan_Tamil_village_deities, though. Hmmm). Any ideas? ≈≈Carolfrog≈≈♦тос♦ 19:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I managed to de-orphan it [2]. I don't know much about Sri Lanka, but perhaps an infobox for "Villages in X Province" might be useful. When I find the time I'll see if I can find any sources or extra info for the article - there must at least be some census data available. Walton^talk 18:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. :) I'll see if I can figure out how to suggest the infobox to the Sri Lanka Wikiproject. ≈≈Carolfrog≈≈♦тос♦ 04:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of @UK PLC article

Hi Carolfrog,

Back on ≈≈Carolfrog≈≈♦тос♦ 06:17, 8 July 2007 (UTC) you let me know that the the @UK PLC article was proposed for deletion and on:-

00:16, 14 July 2007 VirtualSteve (Talk | contribs) deleted "@UK PLC" (This article does not contain reliable secondary sources. It contains no material that is not advertisement for a non-notable software (?) company.)

I have been busy with other things and did not notice that this article was up for review/deletion.

I assume that if it was to be restored it would need some improved secondary sources and some information on why the company is notable.

I am reasonably confident that I can

Improve Secondary Sources and
Tidy up the article to cover the various areas where the company is interesting
And if it meets the criteria for Notable show it is notable

Please let me know how to proceed, and I would like some guidance on what constitutes notable.

e.g. No customers/Turnover/Innovative products/Notoriety/ Gut feel ?

To me the company is important in relation to the process of Company Formation/Business Incorporation, and they do some interesting things in the electronic marketplace/eprocurement areas.

PS How do you get back the original content, or does it need recreated from scratch.

RonaldDuncan 15:58, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Adjuster thunk

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Adjuster thunk, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Adjuster thunk is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Adjuster thunk, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 06:00, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Arsenicum album

An editor has nominated Arsenicum album, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arsenicum album and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:44, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

m:Global sysops/Vote

Hello - You, or someone with your username, has voted in the Global Sysops Vote but you don't have a Unified Login (SUL account). Please could you:

merge your accounts
or add a link from your Meta user page to your local user page.

This is necessary to confirm your identity or your vote may not be counted. Thank you --(RT) (talk) 11:37, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Causes of Bacterial Vaginosis.

Hey Carol,

I was wondering, since my english isn't very well, if you are able to add the 2 studies below as causes of bacterial veginosis?

It would be beneficial to many.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bacterial_vaginosis

However, even after adjustment for colonization status at baseline and for race, an increase in nonoxynol-9 exposure was associated with a statistically significant increase in colonization by anaerobic gram-negative rods, H2O2-negative lactobacilli, and bacterial vaginosis. - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1380307/

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1316413

Thanks, Cobgenius (talk) 17:02, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quixotic plea

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} 04:31, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Community kitchen listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Community kitchen. Since you had some involvement with the Community kitchen redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 22:32, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 16 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Baltimore Police Department page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Carolfrog. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coal pollution mitigation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Domestic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Carolfrog. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Carolfrog. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]