User talk:Carol.w.greider

Edits to Carol Greider

Thanks for your recent edits to Carol W. Greider. As your edits were unsourced, I had to revert them per Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons.

1. Per this source, Carol Greider married Nathaniel C. Comfort in 1993. I have not seen any sources which indicate they are no longer married.

2. Per this source, the discovery was made on Christmas of 1984.

3. The image uploaded, File:GREIDER_Carol_2014.jpg, is currently missing evidence of permission. More details can be found on the file's page.

4. There was evidence supporting Leslie Wilson's contribution as an advisor and has been left.

If you have any evidence supporting the changes you've attempted, please feel free to add them. Keep in mind, however, that if this is the real Carol Greider it is a potential Wikipedia:Conflict of interest-like situation, hence the need for secondary sources.

Welcome to Wikipedia and please let me know if you have any further questions!

—GauchoDude (talk) 21:48, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Carol.w.greider. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Carol W. Greider, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 17:50, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please re-read the above. 331dot (talk) 01:34, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Carol.w.greider, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:56, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A summary of site policies and guidelines you may find useful

It is recommended that you do not add anything relating to yourself to article space, and it is expressly forbidden to use Wikipedia to promote anything about yourself.
Wikipedia is not censored. If material is reliably sourced, it is given due weight.
"Truth" is not the main criteria for inclusion, verifiability is.
We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.
Credentials are irrelevant, noone here cares about them, we will ignore them.
Assume good faith as much as reasonably possible, and then about half-way past the border for unreasonable possibility. -- GauchoDude's posts on your talk page meet our civility guidelines, even if you do not want him to help you understand how this site works.
Noone owns any article here, or even their edits to articles. The text at the bottom of the edit page, right above the "Save page" button basically means that if you don't want someone to change or even remove what you add, then you need to use another site.

Ian.thomson (talk) 02:59, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please also note that no Wikipedia editor is under any obligation to respond to requests from other editors, or from the subjects of their edits, to discuss their edits outside of Wikipedia (including by phone or email), or to share their identity or contact information with anyone. The correct venue to discuss concerns about the contents of any Wikipedia article is on that article's Talk page; or to discuss more specifically the actions of a particular editor, use the editor's Talk page. Dwpaul ^Talk 17:36, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]