Jump to content

User talk:Carol.McGinnis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 17:37, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Your articles on the museum and the reference library were marked by another editor for speedy deletion as no indication of importance. As reviewing administrator, I thought they did indicate at least some importance. What they did not however do, is prove notability.

A Wikipedia article needs to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases.

A Wikipedia article needs to be written like an encyclopedia article, not a press release--don't praise the organization or person, say what they do. Don't talk about the overall importance of the subject--talk about what they have accomplished. Remember not to copy from a web site, even your own -- first it's a copyright violation, but, even if you own the copyright and are willing to give us permission according to WP:DCM, the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable. (Thus, there is generally no purpose in giving permission; it is better to rewrite.)

Include only material that would be of interest to a general reader coming across the mention of the subject and wanting the sort of information that would be found in an encyclopedia. Do not include material that would be of interest only to those associated with the subject, or to prospective visitors--that sort of content is considered promotional. Hours and admission fees are exactly what is not wanted here--it belongs on their web page. sort of material.

I would suggest combining this material into the one on the association. As for that article at AfC. I have looked at it, and it has the same problem: no third party sources., It might also have some material copied from the association's own publications. There should at least be substantial references to it in hobbyist magazines, though it would greatly help if there were at least one from a more general interest publication.

If you want the articles to stay in WP,do them right. DGG ( talk ) 22:00, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of National Toy Train Museum for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Toy Train Museum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Toy Train Museum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cindy(talk to me) 08:09, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Beg to differ with what's above -- Good start, keep editing!

[edit]
A plate of cookies as thanks for your article!

Good start on your article! I went in and turned it into Wikipedia style as best I could ... Since this is a collaborative, cooperative project, my philosophy is more pitch in, So fix it!, rather than spending lots of time telling other people what I think they need to do differently.

That museum is a great spot for kids, so I'd like to see the article stay up. What would probably do the trick would be adding an article about it from a model railroading magazine ... User:Pigsonthewing e-mailed some of the GLAM folks to see if there's something they can find in the museum literature.

What folks don't tell you when you start out here is that writing a new article that won't get deleted is a rather advanced skill; there are a bunch of tricks to it that aren't immediately obvious.

One easy thing to do, now that you've figured out the basics of editing, is adding wikilinks to articles, and, of course copyediting existing articles. The easiest way to figure out how these articles are supposed to be written is work on a bunch of them. I also like the videos and handouts at the Bookshelf for Beginners.

Meanwhile, I'd suggest you introduce yourself over at the Teahouse, where they specialize in assisting new editors and giving you a friendlier reception than what you've experienced so far :) Djembayz (talk) 14:41, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse logo
Hello! Carol.McGinnis, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! A412 (Talk • C) 05:15, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Carol.McGinnis. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Go Phightins! 19:52, 9 December 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Carol.McGinnis. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Gtwfan52 (talk) 00:11, 10 December 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Andrew (talk) 15:54, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Carol!

[edit]

Hey, I just wanted you to know that I have been cleaning up your article at AfC (the one that you got the decline on just above). My best suggestion for secondary sources would be Model Railroader or what ever publication of Kalmbach's that covers large gauge. They certainly must have mentioned your organization or one of their events somewhere. What you are going to need is an article about an event or the organization. A listing on a list of model railroad organizations will not help. I have been removing the in-article hyperlinks (which are frowned upon) and converting them to inline references, which is what I think you were going for in the first place. And a question...all those books you have listed at the bottom? Are they meant to be references (in which case they will need to be tied to the specific bit they are referencing and what pages in the book you are referring to), or are they to be additional reading? This is good info that needs to be in the encyclopedia. Let's get it there, ok? I am here to help! Gtwfan52 (talk) 22:37, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Does your organization have a headquarters and a logo? If so, an infobox (this one is probably the most appropriate: Template:Infobox organization) would probably be a good addition to the article. Infoboxes are the thingies you see on the right side of many articles that summarize the nuts and bolts information on the organization (things like address, year founded, head official, webpage, logo, etc.) The article, besides referencing, needs to be organized into subsections for clarity and usability. I am going to finish up with the in article links and then get started on trying to rewrite the article into sections. If you would rather do that yourself, please just let me know. Please try to find some notability references like what I suggested from Model Railroader, etc. I think that once the article looks a little cleaner, it will have a better chance to pass, but those references that show notability are really important. This is good work! I am a 1:1 scale guy, but I am more than willing to help you get this in the 'pedia! Gtwfan52 (talk) 23:12, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Carol.McGinnis. You have new messages at Gtwfan52's talk page.
Message added 20:57, 1 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Gtwfan52 (talk) 20:57, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Train Collectors Association concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Train Collectors Association, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:07, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Train Collectors Association concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Train Collectors Association, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Train Collectors Association

[edit]

Hello Carol.McGinnis. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Train Collectors Association".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Train Collectors Association}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:26, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Train Collectors Association has been accepted

[edit]
Train Collectors Association, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- Sam Sailor Talk! 07:44, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Carol.McGinnis&oldid=1053859041"