User talk:Carlosar45

Welcome!

Hello, Carlosar45, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Dance, Dance, Chicago, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Fbifriday (talk) 08:48, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dance, Dance, Chicago

A tag has been placed on Dance, Dance, Chicago requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fbifriday (talk) 08:48, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have declined to delete this article, but please add reliable sources to new articles when you create them! This will avoid this problem happening in future. Best regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:09, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Hannah Montana (season 3). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 21:24, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Hannah Montana 3, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Speedy deletion nomination of Princess Protection Program 2

A tag has been placed on Princess Protection Program 2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Airplaneman ^talk 21:31, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hatching Pete 2: The Roosters Vs. The Falcons

The article Hatching Pete 2: The Roosters Vs. The Falcons has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article appears to be a hoax. Unable to find anything about this outside Wikipedia. Article creator has a record of adding incorrect information to articles

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AussieLegend (talk) 06:34, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Hannah Montana (season 3). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Please read the editnotice bfore adding again. (It's the thing at the top with the big red letters) AussieLegend (talk) 04:20, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hannah Montana 4

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Hannah Montana 4, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ^missrain(talk) 01:08, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Finally Home

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Finally Home, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. AussieLegend (talk) 01:30, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Miley Cyrus, you will be blocked from editing. You can not continue to add unsourced information to articles. AussieLegend (talk) 01:34, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Starstruck Soundtrack Cover.PNG

Thank you for uploading File:Starstruck Soundtrack Cover.PNG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 04:53, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

unsourced material

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article List of Sonny With a Chance episodes, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.—Kww(talk) 19:36, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to List of The Suite Life on Deck episodes. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 01:30, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ICarly: iFix A Popstar

A tag has been placed on ICarly: iFix A Popstar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Terrillja _talk 18:52, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Hannah Montana episodes, you will be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (talk) 00:56, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability

Since you are clearly not understanding the numerous warnings that you have been given I'm going to try to explain the basic points here. In a nutshell, everything that you add to Wikipedia must be verifiable, in accordance with Wikipedia:Verifiability, one of Wikipedia's core policies. This means that what you add must be able to be supported by citations from reliable sources. Edits that can't be supported with citations from reliable sources, such as this, this, this and this, should not be made. For the same reasons, articles that can not be supported with citations from reliable sources, such as those listed above on this page, should not be created. An administrator warned you about the need to add citations when Dance, Dance, Chicago was created,[1] but you have ignored his warning.

Also inappropriate are edits such as this and especially this, in which you've added information using citations that are not related to the information that you've added. Such edits can be considered vandalism In the second example,[2] it's fairly clear that you knew what you were doing because you deliberately deleted the warning that told you not to do what you were doing as the very first part of your edit.[3] --AussieLegend (talk) 02:35, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Dylan and Cole Sprouse. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. | Uncle Milty | talk | 21:00, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Brenda Song, you will be blocked from editing. | Uncle Milty | talk | 21:02, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Livin The Suite Life with Hannah and Sonny

A tag has been placed on Livin The Suite Life with Hannah and Sonny requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:13, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Livin The Suite Life with Hannah and Sonny, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Baseball1015 (talk) 05:54, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. œ ^™ 08:43, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Please take the time to re-read the linked pages in the welcome message at the top of our page. I'd also point you towareds WP:NOR and WP:CITE. If you add something to a article, say where you got it from. There are various templates to assist with referencing, such as {{cite web}}, {{cite book}} and {{cite}}. Mjroots (talk) 09:32, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page List of Hannah Montana episodes has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Boomshadow ^talk _contribs 03:30, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hannah Montana, you will be blocked from editing. Eeekster (talk) 04:41, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aliens in the Attic 2: Back Downstairs

A tag has been placed on Aliens in the Attic 2: Back Downstairs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 02:18, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Guilty Pleasure Tour

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Frmatt (talk) 02:23, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. NeilN ^{talk to me} 06:44, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sex and the City 3

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Sex and the City 3, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Walter Siegmund (talk) 22:03, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated creation of hoax articles. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Blueboy 96 22:22, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]