User talk:Carl Francis/Archive 3
Disambiguation link notification for September 30
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited AJ Dee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Buzz. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 7
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited January Isaac, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blackbelt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia Asian Month!
[edit]Hi there! Thanks for joining Wikipedia Asian Month. Here is some information about participating in the event:
- Please submit your articles via this tool. Click 'log in' at the top-right and OAuth will take care the rest. You can also change the interface language at the top-right.
- Once you submit an article, the tool will add a template to the article and mark it as needing review by an organizer. You can check your progress using the tool, which includes how many accepted articles you have.
- Participants who achieve 4 accepted articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard. You will receive another special postcard if you achieve 15 accepted articles. The Wikipedian with the highest number of accepted articles on the English Wikipedia will be honored as a "Wikipedia Asian Ambassador", and will receive a signed certificate and additional postcard.
- If you have any problems accessing or using the tool, you can submit your articles at this page next to your username.
- Wikipedia Asian Month is also held in other language Wikipedia and count independently. Check for language editions
- If you have any question, you can take a look at our Q&A or post on the WAM talk page.
Best Wishes, AddisWang (talk) 03:15, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Carl Francis. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Madelaine Petsch
[edit]Hi, it seems that she is quite popular [1], so I changed your redirect to a stand alone article. Please let me know if you have any objections. Thank you. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 17:51, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia Asian Month 2017: Invitation to Participate
[edit]Hello! Last year, you signed up to participate in Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) 2016 on the English Wikipedia. The event was an international success, with hundreds of editors creating thousands of articles on Asian topics across dozens of different language versions of Wikipedia.
I'd like to invite you to join us for Wikipedia Asian Month 2017, which once again lasts through the month of November. The goal is for users to create new articles on Asian-related content, each at least 3,000 bytes and 300 words in length. Editors who create at least four articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard!
Also be sure to check out the Wikipedia Asian Art Month affiliate event - creating articles on Asian art topics can get you a Metropolitan Museum of Art postcard!
If you're interested, please sign up here for the English Wikipedia. If you are interested in also working on other language editions of Wikipedia, please visit the meta page to see other participating projects. If you have any questions, please visit our talk page.
Thank you!
- User:SuperHamster and User:Titodutta on behalf of The English Wikipedia WAM Team
This will be the last message you receive from the English Wikipedia WAM team for being a 2016 participant. If you sign up for WAM 2017, you will continue receiving periodic updates on the 2017 event.
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Carl Francis. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Damien Puckler listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Damien Puckler. Since you had some involvement with the Damien Puckler redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 18:18, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Yoh Asakura.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Yoh Asakura.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk:Bela Padilla#Nationality
[edit]You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Bela Padilla#Nationality. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:01, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 13
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rafael Rosell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ASAP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 12
[edit]An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Ejay Falcon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Cosmopolitan
- Lauren Young (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Cosmopolitan
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 19
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ejay Falcon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cosmopolitan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Carl Francis. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: College of the Immaculate Conception (Mandaue)
[edit]Hello Carl Francis. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of College of the Immaculate Conception (Mandaue), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 06:30, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hummerrocket (talk) 14:47, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Could you please expand this draft the way you did with Jemma Simmons? After all, you created it. --Kailash29792 (talk) 13:17, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of She-Hulk (TV series) for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article She-Hulk (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/She-Hulk (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 11:08, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
2019 US Banknote Contest
[edit]US Banknote Contest | ||
---|---|---|
November-December 2019 | ||
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here |
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]The article Dragonna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 15:59, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Dragonna.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Dragonna.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 14
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iyah Mina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cosmopolitan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
File:Bazooka58.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bazooka58.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:24, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Warning about your disruptive edits
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. TheHotwiki (talk) 04:32, 12 June 2021 (UTC) @Hotwiki: What's disruptive about my edits? In fact, you're the one being disruptive. Do you read? Did you check what I did. Did you click on the link or did you revert without checking? Carl Francis (talk) 06:56, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
[edit]There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. TSventon (talk) 14:30, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Warning
[edit]Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NewManila2000 (talk) 13:49, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. NewManila2000 (talk) 13:50, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Miss Understanding
[edit]Hi User:Carl Francis I think we just didn't understand each other when I edited the photo and also when I removed Juddha paolo's name from Star Magic because she's not really totally in Star magic, He's really in Viva Agency so I removed it. so now I explain I hope we're ok Mundong Earth (talk) 20:16, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Edit war
[edit]You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Juddha Paolo. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. MACCWIKI (talk) 13:40, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 10
[edit]An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Miko Palanca
- added a link pointing to GMA
- Pia Wurtzbach
- added a link pointing to GMA
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Edit warring at Juddha Paolo
[edit]Hello Carl Francis. You've been warned for edit warring at Juddha Paolo per the result of the edit warring complaint. You may be blocked if you revert the article again without getting a prior consensus in your favor on the article talk page. EdJohnston (talk) 17:32, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 26
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lindsay Custodio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GMA.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Ivana Alawi
[edit]Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Whats wrong with my edit, according to WP:ACTOR: Ref. This is an optional field for sourcing that can to be used when a work may be obscure or difficult to confirm. PLEASE READ.—It'sCtrlwiki • talk • 22:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Reference styles
[edit]Please don't go around changing reference styles, as you did in this edit. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:50, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 28
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gloria Sevilla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asian Journal.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ― Blaze The WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#0001 14:16, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:AliceAnime.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:AliceAnime.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi!
[edit]Hi! Did you know that there is a process of how to cite in an easy way? —Ctrlwiki • talk • 00:55, 19 December 2021 (UTC)