User talk:CarlKenner

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

• Be Bold!
• Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
• Meet other new users
• Learn from others
• Play nice with others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay · Talk 06:48, July 14, 2005 (UTC)

MAJMUNCINO,NIJE BIO VANDALIZAM JER RADOI NAVIJACI I JESU POZNATI KAO NAJVECI RASISTI:UNITED FORCE,ODRED,DUSAN SILNI.........DEBILU ,PRE NEGO STO NESTO PISES PRVO ZADJI NA STADION DA SE RASPITAS,JER AKO NIKAD NISI BIO NA RADOVOJ UTAKMICI ONDA TI VANDALIZUJES.NEMOJ VISE DA BI MI OBRISAO STA SAM NAPISAO IZ CLANKA O RADU!!!Dzoni 19:14, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, but as it indicates on my user page, I don't speak Serbo-croatian, or whatever it is you are speaking. And no amount of shouting at me with big exclamation marks is going to help. Carl Kenner 19:20, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject:Serbia

I hope you'll enjoy contributing with all of us from the project. I have some questions for you, don't be scared, it's just to inform us of your views:

• Why did you join WikiProject Serbia?

The serbia articles are of poor quality and plagued by POV and constant reverts by fervent nationalists. They need some unbiased people to work on them to bring them up to the same quality as other articles. Also there is a lack of articles compared to richer, English speaking regions.

• What is your motivation in writing and editing Serbia-related articles?

People should be able to learn about Serbia and related topics, and contribute to such articles.

• How much do you know about Serbia?

Not much yet. Sorry. My main advantage is that I am not an extremely biased nationalist, and I am not in any way involved in the regional conflicts, and thus can contribute a much needed level of neutrality.

• How much time are you willing to set aside for the project?

I don't know. I've also been working on other Wikipedia stuff (mostly adding Country articles to Vietnamese Wikipedia), and I probably should do some other non-wikipedia stuff sometimes :-).

Please answer the questions in order to verify you have joined the project for the greater good of Serbia-related articles. Thank you,

Project Manager - serbiana - talk 00:28, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to answer the questions. I'm pleased to see that you are showing interest in Serbia-related articles. Although, I'd like to recommend for you to learn some stuff about Serbia, especially about the wars in the 1990s, because, as you have said, we need an un-biased approach to the issues.

Since reading books will take a while, I suggest you watch some of the documentaries available on the internet, especially the ones that Google Video offers. The movie I have to recommend is "Yugoslavia:The Avoidable War, Part 1" and "Avoidable War, Part 2". It's in english, but it has Serbian subtitles, hope you don't mind. Anyways, once again, I welcome you to the project, and hope that we will have fun working on Serbia-related articles. Peace. --serbiana - talk 21:39, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Three-revert rule

Please don't revert elections in Cuba again. You've gone way over the three-revert rule. I'll overlook your previous reverts because you're new, but if you do so again, you're asking to be blocked for 24 hours. Ambi 10:37, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

I haven't reverted anyone's work (not even once), as you know perfectly well. Please refrain from Vandalism and quit abusing your priviliges. Carl Kenner 10:55, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

I've reviewed your block and I see no problem with it, so I've removed the tag. Please stop accusing good editors of vandalism. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 11:47, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Page moves

Hi Carl. Please remember when renaming pages to use the move function, rather than the cut-and-paste method, as the latter does not keep page histories intact (which, for licensing reasons, is a Bad Thing). Regards, --cj | talk 16:47, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Hi again. Have a look over Help:Moving a page. You need use the "move" tab above the page.--cj | talk 02:23, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

OK, found it. Carl Kenner 05:06, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Talk page

Hello. I've unprotected your talk page. I thought you would like to know. -- zzuuzz^(talk) 23:35, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Vietnam WikiProject

I am told you might be interested in a separate WikiProject for Vietnam, like Wikipedia:WikiProject Southeast Asia, I have posted the proposal at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Vietnam_WikiProject Chris 04:16, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Kosovo: country debate

Hello. There's a discussion going on Talk:List of countries as to whether or not Kosovo should be included in that list. You have an interest in Serbia-related articles and I thought you might be interested. The articles List of countries and Annex to the list of countries (where the inclusion criteria reside) are both relevant. Cheers. DSuser 13:38, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

It clearly needs to be included, according to the description at the top of the article. It is not controlled at all by Serbia, it is self-governed, with the government organised and backed by the United Nations. Carl Kenner 17:00, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Carl Kenner

Just out of interest are you? [1]? (your welcome to e-mail me if you would prefer) Nil Einne 15:00, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Looking at your edit history, specifically # 07:09, 20 December 2004 (hist) (diff) Cyberglove (Integrated with related wikipedia articles by other people, added some detail) & # 06:31, 20 December 2004 (hist) (diff) P5 (P5 is a cyberglove by Essential Reality), I'm guess you are :-P Nil Einne 15:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I am. Carl Kenner 17:58, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Legal status of Hawaii

Aloha - I hate to ask anyone to look at a rather embarrassing Edit War, but I wonder if you can take a look at this page (and the discussion page) and give me your opinion? The EW has spread to my talk page (and many other pages), where I've been accused of attacking rich white people. I do admit that I did call certain members of one particular anti-sovereignty group in Hawai'i "hypocritical" for being rich and white and waging constant lawsuits against native Hawaiians, who are largely brown and poor. But I don't feel like I'm being offensive, and if I'm wrong, I need to know. I would really appreciate your honest opinion on this, along with any suggestions. Mahalo nui! Aloha, --Laualoha 12:19, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Brotherhood 2.0

A tag has been placed on Brotherhood 2.0, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. TheRingess (talk) 17:33, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Your edits

Please stop falsely marking your edits as minor when they're clearly not. --TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 13:00, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Huh? what are you talking about? Carl Kenner (talk) 11:32, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Philosopher's Stone

You might want to tone down your edit summary a bit from this. The Sorcerer's Stone had been there for over two months, that maybe makes a whole lot of people, including me, who edited it in that time a bit lazy not to have noticed, but i don't think any of us, including the user who did it, would like to be considered ignorant fools. Not only that, it's the only edit that user has made; what if he comes back and sees that summary? Quite an introduction, eh? Cheers, Lindsay 17:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Project talk page tagging for WP:VIET

Blnguyen had requested me for the service of TinucherianBot to tag articles in the categories in Wikipedia:WikiProject Vietnam/Categories for the WikiProject Vietnam. I request the members to kindly have a look , carefully verify ALL the categories and remove all the possibly wrong categories. Please Dont misunderstand by being cautious here , as we have faced many issues with such huge scale bot tagging earlier. Once I get the final go ahead, I will start the bot with the final list. Thank you for choosing TinucherianBot for the project,. It is a pleasure working for this project...I have also left a note at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Vietnam#Project_talk_page_tagging and request your comments there. You are receiving this message as you are a member of the project. Thanks -- Tinu Cherian - 06:06, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Joseph Cao

You've made an undiscussed name change to the article Joseph Cao. Most online & print sources refer to him as "Joseph Cao". Joseph is not necessarily a nickname, as it might be his saint's name. Please refer to WP:COMMONNAME and some precedents such as Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter. DHN (talk) 07:45, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Your inclusion of the {{Vietnamese name}} template shows that you are attempting to push your POV into the article. Virtually all news sources, including Vietnamese-language media, refer to him as "Cao" and not "Anh". DHN (talk) 09:32, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

File:PhanChuTrinh.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:PhanChuTrinh.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:15, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Corrine Brown, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. See the talk page Omarcheeseboro (talk) 20:45, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Research survey invitation

Greetings CarlKenner-

My name is Randall Livingstone, and I am a doctoral student at the University of Oregon, studying digital media and online community. I am posting to invite you to participate in my research study exploring the work of Wikipedia editors who are members of WikiProject: Countering Systemic Bias. The online survey should take 20 to 25 minutes to complete and can be found here:

https://oregon.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_cSHzuwaQovaZ6ss

Your responses will help online communication researchers like me to better understand the collaborations, challenges, and purposeful work of Wikipedia editors like you. In addition, at the end of the survey you will have the opportunity to express your interest in a follow-up online interview with the researcher.

This research project has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Research Committee as well as the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon. For a detailed description of the project, please visit its Meta page. This survey is voluntary, and your confidentiality will be protected. You will have the choice of using your Wikipedia User Name during the research or creating a unique pseudonym. You may skip any question you choose, and you may withdraw at any time. By completing the survey, you are providing consent to participate in the research.

If you have any questions about the study, please contact me via my Talk Page (UOJComm) or via email. My faculty advisor is Dr. Ryan Light. If you have any questions regarding your rights as a research participant, please contact the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

Randall Livingstone School of Journalism & Communication University of Oregon UOJComm (talk) 03:46, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

You should come hang out with us on the internetz!

Hi! I wanted to let you know that we have created an IRC channel for "countering systemic bias one new editor at a time", aka closing the gender gap! Come hang out at #wikimedia-gendergap if that subject interests you. We hope this channel can serve as a safe haven to hang out, talk about Wiki, brainstorming, women in Wikimedia, article alerts and foster friendships. I hope you join us! (And if you need any IRC help, just let me know!) See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 22:12, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oculus Rift, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gyro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tommy Ngô

The article Tommy Ngô has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. PamD 16:41, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Recent edits to Iris (anatomy)

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s). While your edit seems to be correct, I believe Wikipedia standard for such things is that it be discredited in the softer manner (as is already done by "... is not supported by quality research studies and is considered pseudoscience). Thank you! DemocraticLuntz (talk) 15:15, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, CarlKenner. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, CarlKenner. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, CarlKenner. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CarlKenner. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

January 2019

Your recent editing history at Baked Alaska (entertainer)‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. wumbolo ^^^ 01:57, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Neo-Nazism

Oh, look, meaning: Neo-Nazism#United_States.

Your unwillingness to see something doesn't automagically make said something disappear. --Calton | Talk 03:01, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

NPA

Do not accuse another editor of "far left vandalism". It is a personal attack. Consider this your only warning. If I see you do it again, I will block you.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:10, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Baked Alaska (activist). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Please do not use edit-summaries to WP:NPA other editors. Dr. K. 23:15, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions – such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks – on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--RexxS (talk) 16:33, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)