User talk:Cargom

July 2014

Hello, I'm Eeekster. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person on Julia Furdea, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 04:37, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yasmin Verheijen with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 23:08, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cargom, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Cargom! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Miss universe 2015

Hello Cargom,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Miss universe 2015 for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 01:44, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Universe 2015

The article's title you made is wrong, can you copy and paste the current article to Miss Universe 2015. I would do it but the history should say you created it. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 01:59, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you didn't have to remove half the article. You can put it back. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 02:00, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss universe 2015, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beni. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:45, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss Universe 2015 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Universe 2015 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Universe 2015 (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 14:23, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cargom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello First, I would like to say that I think I have done to many proper and good edits to Wikipedia articles, so I think there is no reason why I'm blocked. I think I will be doing proper edits as I did after I was blocked, but I would like to know why the person who blocked me did that.

Decline reason:

Account not directly blocked. only (talk) 13:06, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not directly blocked. Please use {{unblock-auto}} instead, making sure to fill that template out with all required information. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 03:40, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Cargom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

181.141.69.118 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

CheckUser evidence has determined that this IP address or network has been used (not necessarily by you) to disrupt Wikipedia. It has been blocked from editing to prevent further abuse.

Blocking administrator: Ponyo (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: The Ip that was blocked is clearly yours based on the areas of interest. The IP address is a proxy which is banned from Wikipedia. only (talk) 02:52, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cargom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to be unblocked, since I found out that I'm blocked because of being a sockpuppet of Mrdhimas, which is completely false. And I really want to keep editing, because there is so much false information, and I want to change it, to make a better Wikipedia. Thanks.

Decline reason:

There seems to be sufficient evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mrdhimas/Archive to justify this block. Nick-D (talk) 02:14, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.