User talk:Cargill208

Welcome!

Hello, Cargill208, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like F*INK, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 05:37, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of F*INK

A tag has been placed on F*INK requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 05:37, 20 March 2009 (UTC) {subst:nn-warn|F*INK|header=1}} Cargill208 (talk) 05:47, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{subst:nn-warn|F*INK|header=1}} Cargill208 (talk) 05:49, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added a {{hangon}} template to an article, F*INK. In order for an administrator to evaluate whether the article should be speedy deleted or not, we request that you provide reasoning, on the article's talk page, for why it should remain. Thank you. Killiondude (talk) 05:51, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help requests

Hi. Whenever you wish to request help, please put the {{helpme}} tag here on your talk page, rather than within the article or the article's talk page. Cheers! Taroaldo (talk) 06:45, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Caroline McCaw

A tag has been placed on Caroline McCaw requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Capricorn24 (talk) 07:35, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} I am editing the article for 'f*INK', it will take some time but I don't want the article removed (it's tagged for deletion). The subject is worthy - how do I make sure the page is not deleted?

You need to provide enough reliable sources that show that the article is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia. If you read Wikipedia's notability policy, that might help you. If the article is deleted before you have time to show it is notable (if it is indeed so), you can ask any administrator on Wikipedia to provide you a copy of what you wrote (you can later come back and resubmit it with the proper sources to show notability). Killiondude (talk) 07:54, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

templates

Please stop repositioning CSD templates in F*INK. Thank you. Taroaldo (talk) 08:10, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of F*INK

I have nominated F*INK, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F*INK. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Taroaldo (talk) 21:18, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fink

Hi, I've voted to keep the article; I hope you'll be able to source some valid references. Good luck; -- Chzz ► 02:48, 22 March 2009 (UTC) P.S. I've also tagged it for the article rescue squad; hopefully they'll help. -- Chzz ► 02:50, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did you manage to find further refs? Let me know on my talk. -- Chzz ► 15:30, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was pleased to see that the result of the deletion discussion was 'No consensus' - which means that it will be kept for now, although it doesn't preclude a further debate at a later date. If you can manage to improve the article further - especially with more, good references - then I can't see any further problems.

So - good luck, and if you have any further questions that I can help with, please leave me a note in a new section on my talk. Cheers! -- Chzz ► 00:48, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

f*INK

Hi Martin - I've had a look at the article. It's still a little thin notability-wise as far as Wikipedia's concerned, but I think it's got enough in the way of external refefrences now that it would survive if anyone else decided to take it for deletion. Grutness...wha? 13:51, 29 May 2009 (UTC) (James)[reply]

WikiMagazine Project

Hi Cargill208, I noticed you are a member of the WikiProject Magazine, which I have joined and will contribute in the future. I have created a new page for an online magazine Bloginity which was up for speedy deletion several times for several reasons. I was hoping to get your voice on this matter and help me get the page published as it contains quality and informative information for anyone who is interested in reading about the background, and foundation. I am looking forward to your reply, and hoping that you would share your voice in this article entry. (71.190.254.239 (talk) 21:18, 20 January 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Nina Czegledy with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arthur Street School

The article Arthur Street School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable school. No independent sources with in depth coverage as required by the WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing! ~ Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 01:11, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Arthur Street School

Hello, Cargill208. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arthur Street School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 14:42, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]