User talk:Caretaker John

February 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Civic Platform (Russia), may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 16:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, is it because I used the same words as in the articles, should i have used more my own words? Caretaker John (talk) 19:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Drmies (talk) 15:32, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Caretaker John (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not a sockpuppet of another account, a simple CU would confirm that Caretaker John (talk)

Decline reason:

According to the SPI, this is CU confirmed. 331dot (talk) 16:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot: @Drmies: I just noticed that the user Beanom, who was blocked because he was suspected to be related sock of Gordimalo but then unblocked on 17 February, has started editing again for the first time since 17 February right after Caretaker John was blocked and is restoring Caretaker John's edits on pages they've never edited before. Mellk (talk) 17:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, they are slowly restoring all edits by Caretaker John that was reverted by Drmies in pages they've never edited before. How blatant. Mellk (talk) 18:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]