User talk:Carboncopy
Welcome to my Talk Page
[edit]Insert comments here.--Carboncopy 17:33, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
External links guidelines
[edit]After checking the history of External links, it appears that the guidelines were changed very recently; your quote on Talk:Piano tuning I think was correct at the time. (I don't really agree with the change either.) - Rainwarrior 19:55, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Yes, I figured that out after I posted my edit to Talk:Piano tuning. The External links article used to refer to "objectionable advertising." I almost went back to the Talk page and explained that, but at the last minute decided to wait. I'll wait to see if the topic comes up again. I have a feeling it will... -- Carboncopy 20:04, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- I put a post on the external links page asking for information about the change to the guidelines. It looks like we both reverted the same edit to Care and maintenance of pianos. The fact that they are the same group of links in dispute at the other page is suspicious. Also LONGTIMERPT's edit message "this too has been discussed" seems not to refer to discussion on the piano tuning talk page but to a question my2cents asked on Antandrus' talk page. The list of users whose only contributions have been to this particular issue is growing in a rather conspicuous way. - Rainwarrior 20:36, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Funny you should mention that. If I were a suspicious person, I'd wonder if there is a little cabal (if there is indeed more than one user) concerned about the release of privileged information to the layity. The continued attacks on a homespun tuning website, and the insistance on linking to professional schools, organizations and suppliers do give one pause.Carboncopy 20:51, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Question
[edit]Why did you delete this question? --62.134.230.38 14:32, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! It sounded to me like it was not a serious question. If it was serious, I apologize. Feel free to reinstate it, and I will leave it alone. If you are suggesting that some one should add this information to the main article, then please say it that way. Better yet, research the answer and add your information to the article. (I also recommend that you sign up for an account to get a user name. Makes mistakes like this less likely.) Carboncopy 17:14, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, thank you and sorry - my fault. I expressed it the wrong way. --62.134.177.228 20:46, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
[edit]Your upload of File:Bates grave.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:55, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)