User talk:Caramella1

Welcome!

Hello, Caramella1, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Giant Snowman 12:32, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

3RR

Your recent editing history at Two envelopes problem shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Giant Snowman 12:32, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Caramella, you have reverted twice even after you have been warned. Please stop. Please try to understand how the BRD-cycle works. iNic (talk) 09:40, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, despite warning, at Two envelopes problem. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Giant Snowman 11:17, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Caramella1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to request for comments (RfC) in the talk page. Caramella1 (talk) 05:52, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 08:17, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Jpgordon, as you wish. I wrote that I want to request for comments. Isn't that enough to convince you that I am not intend to "damage or disrupt to Wikipedia" but instead I am trying to find alternative and productive ways to stop this edit warring with INic ?

Two envelopes problem

There needs to be firm consensus on the article talk page. Giant Snowman 09:09, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What happens if an editor (INic) will never accept a change and all other editors agree with it? Also why do you suggest that we should keep INics version until firm consensus and not the version accepted by more editors? Caramella1 (talk) 09:55, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting comments on the talk page.

Caramella, you should not delete comments from the talk page. If you believe they are the work of a sockpuppet you should go to WP:SPI with your evidence. You must not make accusations of sockpuppetry unless this has been conformed by the appropriate authority. Martin Hogbin (talk) 00:35, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Martin, I have already done this and I thought you were aware of this. See here. User Perswapish, whose comment I deleted, is currently blocked indefinitely by WP administrators for sockpuppetry. INic was also blocked for a month for sockpuppetry but made a request for unblocking and the administrators couldn't prove that he is connected to Perswapish. Read the investigation page and make your own mind if Perswapish's account is controlled by INic or not. To me there is absolutely no doubt. Caramella1 (talk) 06:49, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

1 week now, for disruptive editing, in particular, [1]. I am afraid you are clearly not here to build an encyclopedia. Please think very well and do not resume disruption after the block expires. 1 week chosen given the preceding warning and block history.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:18, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]