User talk:Carabinieri/Archive7

Please don't edit this page. This is an archive. To leave me a message click here

Question

Hi. Thanks for the work you've done on the article Battle of Drakenburg. I wrote most of the information about the Augsburg Interim and the Schmalkaldic League. From what I've read, the Augsburg Interim was forced onto the Protestants by Charles V, who, having won the Schmalkaldic War, was in control but nevertheless tired of war. If this is true, did the battle, a protestant victory, have any real significance in the course of German history (I can't find anything on google books about this battle, which makes this hard)? Did they have more political control after the battle had been fought or were they still afraid of the Catholic emperor as the article "Augsburg Interim" suggests? HHermans 21:10, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article about that battle was just a translation from the German article. I can't tell you anything but what the German article says. The only really politically significant long-term consequences of the battle was that it "contributed to the stability and freedom of religion in northern Germany" as the article states. Sorry I can't really help you on this one.--Carabinieri 22:16, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Did you know? was updated. On 15 May, 2007, a fact from the article Marlbrough s'en va-t-en guerre, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--ALoan (Talk) 15:16, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:FAUD Congress.jpg

Hello, Carabinieri. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:FAUD Congress.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Carabinieri/Sandbox. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 03:35, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Next update

ALoan had some points which I addressed, regarding the only entry left for the 11th. I hope you will consider it for Next update, at the time of nom it only had primary sources, but I have added some additional reputable secondary sources. See Marcab Confederacy. Smee 04:44, 17 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Eurocoplogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Eurocoplogo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 20:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Eurocoplogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Eurocoplogo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 20:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Bavaria Party.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bavaria Party.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nick 20:18, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Endoclip

Did you know? was updated. On 20 May, 2007, a fact from the article Endoclip, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 00:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New European Order

Did you know? was updated. On 21 May, 2007, a fact from the article New European Order, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Aquarius  talk 21:31, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sepik

Did you know? was updated. On 23 May, 2007, a fact from the article Sepik, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Smee 16:58, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The 50 DYK Medal

		The 50 DYK Medal
		I, Smee, hereby award you with The 50 DYK Medal, for your over 50 contributions to the Wikipedia:Did you know? section as featured on the Main Page. Your work is appreciated. Thank you. Yours, Smee 04:33, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Did you know? was updated. On 27 May, 2007, a fact from the article Water supply and sanitation in Indonesia, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Smee 01:26, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know? was updated. On 27 May, 2007, facts from the articles Health care in Nigeria, and Albert Kalonji, which you recently nominated, have been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Aquarius  talk 16:03, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know? was updated. On May 29, 2007, a fact from the article Wollongong Lighthouses, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks again Carabinieri. Blnguyen (cranky admin anniversary) 06:46, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:The Terror State.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:The Terror State.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XV (May 2007)

The May 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:29, 9 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

DYK

Be careful not to mention the same person (eg, Frank Lloyd Wright) twice in two different DYK entries at the same time. — BRIAN0918 • 2007-06-11 18:44Z

Did you know?

Did you know? was updated. On 17 June, 2007, a fact from the article Muristan, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-- Nice catch! :) GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 14:32, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bakouma

Did you know? was updated. On 19 June, 2007, a fact from the article Bakouma, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 07:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Did you know? was updated. On 20 June, 2007, a fact from the article Salinosporamide A, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Mango juice^talk 20:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know? was updated. On June 27, 2007, a fact from the article Glomeris marginata, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

On July 2, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article St. Mary's Collegiate Church, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks again Carabinieri!Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:08, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DKY Emin

Thanks for the notification.:) Tyrenius 23:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome.--Carabinieri 15:13, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Message from anon

I read your article and stub about meir vilner and esther vilenska. Im curious what motivated you to write about these two obscure figures?

I don't remember exactly what it was. I've always found Vilner an interesting figure and I must've seen a redlink to him or something, so I wrote that article using the obituary in the Guardian. After I was done, I thought Vilenska would be worth an article as well, so I wrote that short stub.--Carabinieri 15:13, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Hello. I think that Papyrus 45 was made it onto the DYK template and onto the main page. I did not actually see it there, but I did see it on the next update template, so I assume that it later made it. But now, it seems to have disappeared out of the DYK system. It's not in the archive, nor was it returned to the DYK suggestions page. Also, I don't think that the guy who wrote it (who isn't me) got a notification on his talk page for it, and the article's talk page doesn't have a DYK notification. I don't know if all of the other articles that were also on the template at the time have this problem or not. Could you check on this for me? Thanks! SU Linguist 15:57, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've looked through the page histories of the suggestions, next update, and template pages to track the hook down. It turns out User:Wizardman updated DYK on June 24, but did not notify the article creators and nominators, note the use of the article on the main page, and archive the hooks. I've now done all that and left a note on Wizardman's talk page. Thanks for the heads up. --Carabinieri 16:58, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I didn't have time at that point to do the rest of it, I probably should have made a note of it. Sorry if I caused some problems. Wizardman 16:54, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thanks for your help on DYK.--Carabinieri 16:58, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		Furry Beast of Death
		In appreciation for clearing up my DYK issue, I present you with this Furry Beast of Death. Please keep it caged at all times, lest it escape and eat a small child.

SU Linguist 17:13, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the DYK!

Thanks for the DYK on Gabriele Kohlisch. I really appreciate it! Chris 21:48, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Credits

Thanks, that was quick, I was only away for 10 minutes. Yomangani ^talk 12:23, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. I just wanted to do next update, so I took care of the credits first.--Carabinieri 12:25, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK - Bombax

I didn't edit the article that you listed on my talk page, but I noticed that one I did create, Bombax buonopozense, was also listed as a DYK. Thanks! Djlayton4 | talk | contribs 12:25, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I really screwed up some things while doing the credits for DYK.--Carabinieri 12:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Oak Park Il Woolley House2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Oak Park Il Woolley House2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:09, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Minneapolis

		The Original Barnstar
		To Carabinieri, on the occasion of Minneapolis, Minnesota reaching featured article. -Susanlesch 21:45, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Hi, I have added a new article to be considered for DYK about a journalist Selvarajah Rajivarnam. Thanks Taprobanus 14:21, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Dorin Tudoran, was selected for DYK!

On July 2, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dorin Tudoran, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 (talk) 17:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Drakenburg

On 5 July, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Drakenburg, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 04:33, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK error

Can you address the issue at WP:ERRORS? I unintentionally made a hook inaccurate when modifying it for the Next Update, and the contributor has pointed it out, and nobody seems to be looking at that page. Thanks in advance. Rigadoun (talk) 20:07, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New procedure?

No picture in the picture slot article? --Camptown 10:12, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007)

The June 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 13:28, 8 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Alvor Agreement

Did you know? was updated. On 8 July, 2007, a fact from the article Alvor Agreement, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 20:29, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Many thanks for the note at my talk page about the Giichi Nishihara article, Carabinieri. For a guy editing in a difficult and controversial subject area who hasn't earned so much as a Wiki-welcome so far, this is a big day indeed. Thanks! Dekkappai 01:57, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Luxembourg City Hall

Did you know? was updated. On 9 July, 2007, a fact from the article Luxembourg City Hall, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 09:30, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hochstetter

On 9 July, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hochstetter, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 15:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK on 07 July 2007

Thanks for picking Fernando Amorsolo for the DYK column. Regards Dragonbite 20:27, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK: July 14th 2007

Thank you for choosing the Lorenzo M. Tañada article for DYK main page appearance. Cheers. (P.S. This is the 3rd you picked from my "basket of goodies".) Dragonbite 14:37, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK July 14th update

I guess it was my first time and I made some mistakes with that. Sorry. Please, let me know what I need to do for the next time. Thanks John anuel -19:44, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks so much for your explanation, that clears my doubts, John anuel -19:52, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 15th DYK

Did you know? was updated. On 15 July, 2007, a fact from the article Danish constitutional and electoral age referendum, 1953, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-Andrew c ^[talk] 04:11, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Juliana Anicia

Take a look at the template. My nomination was disfigured. --Ghirla^-трёп- 23:27, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Sometimes I'm just way too stupid to copy and paste.--Carabinieri 23:30, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Did you know? was updated. On 18 July, 2007, a fact from the article County of Besalú, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Yomangani ^talk 00:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK Next

I'm afraid that the articles you added lack proper sources. Camptown 12:37, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hook for the DYK

Can you check the new hook (per your request) for the article created on July 17 for 1991 Kokkadichcholai massacre. Thanks 13:47, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Sheerness

Hi. I have now added more on the history of the town. Could you please see if it's enough. Thanks. Epbr123 21:46, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Hi, this is Tymek 04:58, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added sources to the Gestapo-NKVD Conferences article, I have also made some corrections. This is the article which I nominated to DYK on July 17. Hope it looks good now. Greets.

DYK help

Hi I have posted a DYK on a article created on July 20 for Prawn farm massacre, do you think a better hook is needed there ? Taprobanus 13:41, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bademus

Thanks for your concerns concerning Bademus's referencing conventions. I have replied to the issue, and have made what I believe to be the appropriate corrections. On another topic, however, I wanted to point out that the way this issue was handled rankles me a bit. First of all, although I am aware that Wikipedia does not have a template for everything, I thought the Unreferenced template was not suitable for an article wherein sources were referenced, albeit not in the clearest manner. And secondly, I would appreciate it, and I'm sure others would as well if they have DYK nominations up for consideration, that if you find something unsatisfactory about an article in the future, that you notify the creator/nominator of that issue via talk page. I'm currently on vacation (see User:Alekjds), so I can only pop in during free time, and I am not assiduously patrolling my watchlist. IvoShandor's warning of the issue earlier today was a great service to me, as I was able to put things straight, although only after the article's nomination expired. An expedient warning is the sort of couresy I would expect from an admin. Forgive me if it's only out of ignorance of your workload that I make this complaint. Respectfully submitted, Alekjds ^talk 20:14, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If I notified everyone, whose DYK suggestions I comment on, on their respective talk pages, that would really be a lot of work. So unfortunately this is not possible. The DYK suggestions page does recommend that nominators "Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed." As to the use of the template: I assumed the template would only be there for a very short time (until you referenced the source correctly). I also misunderstood what you meant by "various sources". I thought that you had various websites, books, newspaper articles, etc, that you just didn't want to list in the footnote, which would be completely contrary to WP:V. Therefore I just slapped that template on the article, in order to animate the creator to change the article to conform with WP policy and in order to prevent the DYK hook from being used until the issue is cleared up. Thanks for helping DYK.--Carabinieri 22:51, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On an article created on July 17, an admin had a note about two point preventing 1991 Kokkadichcholai massacre showing in the main page. I ahve fixed both the points. Thanks Taprobanus 20:23, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

also can you look at Sivasubramaniam Raveendranath again, most of the POV comments have been taken care of. Thanks Taprobanus 12:51, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shaw and Crompton

Hello Carabinieri,

You left some comments at Shaw and Crompton's FA nomination page, specifically about referencing. I've added some references to the sections you outlined and was wondering if it addressed your concerns enough for you to give the article your support? Jza84 18:24, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]