User talk:CaraTripicchio

Ways to improve Natasha Bassett

Hi, I'm JamesG5. Shelterpr01, thanks for creating Natasha Bassett!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Page it written in promotional speech ("scene stealing debut"). Page has improper inline links to IMDB pages. No actual sources cited. No footnotes. No categories. Page needs a complete re-write.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

JamesG5 (talk) 23:41, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, great job cleaning up the article! Just one note, be careful on tenses/time frames. For instance, "Bassett may currently be seen alongside" should read "as of early 2017 Basset may be seen alongside." You want to avoid anything being overly current-event-ish. Same thing goes for the "will next be seen" line about her upcoming Britney project, that should be adjusted. Hope this helps! JamesG5 (talk) 04:55, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Your addition to Natasha Bassett has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Schwede 66 19:01, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Natasha Bassett

The article Natasha Bassett has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Insert CleverPhrase Here 23:36, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeremie Harris (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not satisfying our simplest standards and notability cannot be inherited from others.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeremie Harris and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 19:06, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeremie Harris (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

The article has improved since the last review but many more citations are needed to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeremie Harris and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 12:32, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Shelterpr01, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DrStrauss talk 12:32, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeremie Harris (May 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The references provided, with the exception of bkmag, do little more than mention Harris in passing (or, less desirable, are PRIMARY references such as interviews). Simply having roles in plays or television, or working on albums with other famous people, is not enough to demonstrate notability; we require significant coverage, and at the moment it's just not here. Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeremie Harris and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 13:10, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jeremie Harris concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jeremie Harris, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Peter Spears Headshot.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Peter Spears Headshot.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:30, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Shelterpr01. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 22:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Hello Shelterpr01. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Shelterpr01. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Shelterpr01|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. Thank you. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:32, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

CaraTripicchio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

CaraTripicchio (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I'd like to change my username to my real name. Thank you. Shelterpr01 (talk) 01:53, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Renamed and unblocked. Please note that we are aware you've been violating WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. Any further violations will result in your block immediately being replaced. You need to read and follow these policies before editing any further. Yamla (talk) 15:30, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've done the rename (from User:Shelterpr01), and someone else will review the unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:09, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

You have violated WP:COI, WP:PAID, WP:PROMO, and WP:SOCK by causing Suriz89 (talk · contribs) and Kakoz0514 (talk · contribs) to edit in violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. This is deeply inappropriate. Any further instances and I'll block you indefinitely. --Yamla (talk) 19:22, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, Wikipedia is a little confusing to understand. I would like to add the paid contribution disclosure on my user page and on Peter Spears talk page before adding a request edit. Would this be the correct way to go about this? Is there any other information I'm missing that should be disclosed? Thank you. CaraTripicchio (talk) 20:53, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You'll also need to address your block evasion: Kakoz0514 (talk · contribs) and Suriz89 (talk · contribs) at least. At this point, you are probably going to have to agree to avoid writing about any subject matter for which you have a conflict of interest. --Yamla (talk) 20:59, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will have those two accounts deleted. I will not write about any subjects that I have a conflict of interest with and in the future, I will also disclose any conflict of interest with new subjects should there be a need. Would that also mean that I can not request any edits on their talk pages? I'm just trying to understand how this all works. CaraTripicchio (talk) 21:06, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm willing to unblock you so long as you are willing to declare your conflict of interest, refrain from any further abuse of multiple accounts, and agree to refrain from writing about or requesting edits about any subject for which you have a conflict of interest. This would include, but not be limited to, suggesting edits on the article talk pages, given your history so far. --Yamla (talk) 21:16, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I will declare all conflict of interests and not ask others to create accounts on my behalf. You are welcome to delete the two accounts yourself if you like. However, if I'm unable to even "suggest" any edits, how will I accomplish what my client is asking? I do apologize for the history of my account, I truly don't know how Wikipedia works. This has all been a trail and error for me. CaraTripicchio (talk) 21:26, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You won't. You repeatedly violated our terms of use and policies (WP:COI, WP:PAID, WP:PROMO, WP:SOCK, WP:BLOCK), and so I think it'd be inappropriate for you to engage in any further paid editing until you can demonstrate, over a prolonged period of time and across several hundred appropriate edits, that you can abide by Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If that means you can't make money off of Wikipedia, I'm afraid that's your problem and not ours. You already had a second chance and went out of your way to violate the terms of your unblock, so this is all the good faith we are willing to extend you at this time. --Yamla (talk) 21:34, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are, by the way, welcome to have another independent administrator consider your case for unblocking. Just place an unblock request here. Maybe someone else will feel differently. --Yamla (talk) 21:36, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

CaraTripicchio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Accept reason:

I have lifted your block on that basis. Yamla (talk) 22:15, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request an unblock JUST so I can add my conflict of interest disclosure to my user page. I won't be making or suggesting any other edits for a prolonged period of time. CaraTripicchio (talk) 22:05, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the unblock. I tried to add the conflict of interest disclosure but it is not allowing me to add anything to the user page. CaraTripicchio (talk) 22:22, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There's no reason I can see why it would stop you, except possibly that one of your other accounts has triggered a block on this one for 24 hours. If so, you should be notified of that when you try to edit. If you wish to post your COI notice here, I'd be happy to immediately move it for you, to your user page. --Yamla (talk) 22:27, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know if any of the below is in incorrect format. Thank you. CaraTripicchio (talk) 22:32, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moved. I'll note this is not the only conflict of interest you have, but it's the only one you've been violating this year. --Yamla (talk) 22:34, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

CaraTripicchio (talk · contribs) has been paid by Brennin Hunt on their behalf. Insert diff to disclosure on your User page.

CaraTripicchio (talk) 20:09, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tobi lou (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Celestina007 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Substantiate all notability claims with reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tobi lou and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tobi lou, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Celestina007 (talk) 22:11, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tobi lou

Hello, CaraTripicchio. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tobi lou, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tobi lou

Hello, CaraTripicchio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tobi lou".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:36, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie Covell pronouns

On the one hand, the sources in the article are six years old or so, but a scan of the sources in Charlie Covell show she/her pronouns. What's your source for changing the article to use they/them? —C.Fred (talk) 21:20, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very recent article on Netflix's official site in which they are writing a series for:

https://www.netflix.com/tudum/articles/kaos-plot-release-date-news

Perrineau’s on-screen husband is still impressed by the world Covell created. “Charlie came up with all these incredible details that were going over the heads of us mere mortals,” Scott tells Tudum. “Charlie’s achievement with this is a celebration, really. They’ve distilled a huge wealth of material while reimagining it and giving it a lot of modern touches.”

The show is set in “our world, but it’s kind of kinked, and it’s different,” they explain. So KAOSdeserved an equally tilted take on a word we’re all familiar with. CaraTripicchio (talk) 15:07, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So it's only a second-hand source, somebody else referring to Covell? —C.Fred (talk) 17:49, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the slam-dunk quote, in the author's own voice, based on interview material with Covell: "Covell was 'obsessed' with Greek mythology from an early age. As a child, they watched..." —C.Fred (talk) 17:57, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There it is! Thank you. CaraTripicchio (talk) 18:08, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]