User talk:Captain printer

Welcome!

Hello, Captain printer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Fleet street phantom, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Joe Chill (talk) 12:24, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fleet street phantom

The article Fleet street phantom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can't find signficaint coverage for this game.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joe Chill (talk) 12:24, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Bea Team

A tag has been placed on The Bea Team requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Vipinhari || talk 09:38, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fleet Street Phantom

The article Fleet Street Phantom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:02, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with The Bea Team. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:59, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hotel Giant game cover

Thank you for uploading File:Hotel Giant.jpg, however a valid game cover has already been uploaded at File:Maximum Capacity Hotel Giant cover.jpg, so another upload is not necessary. Please note that game covers are copyrighted and so such uploads should comply with Wikipedia:Non-free content and the Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. Also, one of the original covers to the game is preferred over a re-sale version, the latter of which being what you uploaded. Furthermore, I have nominated your upload for deletion for lack of source information. CT Cooper · talk 15:25, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IRCG Equipment

Hi. Yesterday you (re)added a note saying that the IRCG operate an Aerospatiale SA 365N. Per the reference and edit summary I added yesterday, (and as far as I know) this is not correct. CHC Ireland Ltd (the company who lease/operate helicopters for the IRCG) have an SA 365N on their books. This is true. However I can find no source or evidence that it's leased to the IRCG for coast guard use. As far as I know it's used by CHC as a private hire. (In fact, if we take a look at a pic of the SA 365N, we see that it's not in IRCG livery. And CHC's own SAR Ireland page says they lease the 6 S61Ns - with no mention of any other types). Of course I could be wrong - Do you have a source to support the claim that it's leased to the IRCG? Guliolopez (talk) 09:59, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Dublin Bus

Hi Captain printer!,

Per WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTGUIDE, WP:NOTTRAVEL and WP:GNG bus routes/networks cant be added, plus they're are not notable, Although you could prose them,

The consensus has been to remove routes See 1 2 3 4 and 5,

Thanks! - →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 15:35 29 September 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dublin Bus. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -
→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 18:35, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fleet Street Phantom

The article Fleet Street Phantom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I cannot find significant coverage of this game in reliable sources. Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NSOFT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 16:52, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]