User talk:CaptainWheeler86

CaptainWheeler86, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi CaptainWheeler86! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Gamerguy94 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:33, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just so everyone knows, none of the above is even remotely true! I have been "blocked" for no apparent reason, because this account is NOT a sockpuppet! I've been mislabeled as something I'm not, and that is wrong! Even though it's a mistake, I still want the general readers to know that the above statements are not true whatsoever! Below is my unblock request- I intentionally wasn't given the proper information so that some other editors could continue to mislabel me as a "sockpuppet" I am NOT a "sockpuppet", and I have no idea as to why I was mislabeled as one!

Hello,

I have been supposedly blocked because my account was accused of being a "sockpuppet" account to some random user that I've never even heard of before! I am appealing this block because my account here is NOT a "sockpuppet"! For one, I don't even know what a "sockpuppet" account is! Second, I've never even heard of the user that my account has been accused of being a "sockpuppet" of, and so I have no idea as to how my account could be labeled as a "sockpuppet" account when I have never even heard of the other user before! There's also the fact that no one shared anything to try and prove otherwise, and I was mislabeled as a sockpuppet without any actual proof or anything else like that! I'm sorry I don't have more information in regards to this, but I wasn't given any, which is hardly fair considering the situation and the fact that I've been mistakenly mislabeled as a sockpuppet! If there had been a legitimate reason (and there wasn't), then somebody should've let me know! I'm sure that this is just a mistake, so I'd appreciate a speedy fix/unblocking ASAP! Thanks! I wish I had more info than what I have right now (which is nothing), but I do not! It's asinine, but that's what happens when you're given no information like this! CaptainWheeler86 (talk) 11:06, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CaptainWheeler86 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wrongfully accused/mislabeled of being a "sockpuppet" account when this account is not. CaptainWheeler86 (talk) 11:06, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Besides the fact this is a confirmed checkuser block, the unblock messages themselves are so painfully obviously the same person that there's no point in continuing this. Revoking TPA (sockmaster is already TPA revoked), @Deepfriedokra: I am not sure how UTRS blocks work, but you may need to go ahead with a block for this account too. -- ferret (talk) 11:55, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Don't know if it will take prophylactically, but we will see. @CaptainWheeler86: CU = WP:check user --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:03, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CaptainWheeler86: All in all, your next stop is WP:ArbCom. I have taken the liberty of banning you at WP:UTRS. You have exhausted that avenue of appeal. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:12, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]