User talk:CaptAubrey
- Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring or sock puppetry.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
- Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Clay Westervelt, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.watchfreemovies.ch/name/clay-westervelt-5385/.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Clay Westervelt
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Clay Westervelt, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.watchfreemovies.ch/name/clay-westervelt-5385/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:07, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
The article Clay Westervelt has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:33, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Added IMDB reference. This person Clay Westervelt is extensively mentioned on multiple Wikipedia pages. CaptAubrey (talk) 22:59, 25 June 2014 (UTC)CaptAubrey
Nomination of Clay Westervelt for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clay Westervelt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clay Westervelt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:40, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Stop!
[edit]Please stop adding nonexistent categories to articles, even if these categories did exist they would be invalid and subject to deletion anyway. The articles you are tagging are already in relevant categories that identify them as films about disability. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:34, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for contacting me. In discussions with people in the disability community, there seems to be a lack of a page on Wikipedia for films about people with disability. There are some existing categories for documentary films about people with disabilities but not one for both documentary and narrative films. This is what I am attempting to address. The additions are based on an established list. CaptAubrey (talk) 19:39, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
I don't understand why this category should not exist. There is for example a category for films about sportspeople with disability, and one about documentary films about disability, yet there is no list of feature films about people with disability or a catch-all, list of films about people with disability. This is a marginalized community and it's difficult to locate media resources about disability, so why would this category be irrelevant? Many of the films I categorized were not identified in this way. CaptAubrey (talk) 19:43, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Okay, looking a bit harder now, I see there is a category list entitled "Films about disability". It's unfortunate that's what it's titled because it should really be "Films about people with disability". The list there is quite incomplete. Is it going to be problematic if I continue what I was doing, adding films to this category? CaptAubrey (talk) 19:46, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- Categories are not lists and lists are not categories, no category title should ever start with "List of...". There are categories "Lists of..." but they contain pages that are actually lists. Category:Films about disability has a number of sub-categories and those subcategories in turn may also have further subcategories. As a general rule when an article is in a given category it is not also included in that category's parent category (or categories). An article titled "List of films about disability" might be possible but it would need careful consideration as it depends on firstly proving that it is a notable topic and finding sufficient good quality sources to support the content. There is already a section about film in the article Disability in the arts and a section about documentary film in the Disability in the media article. This topic should really be thoroughly discussed at WikiProject Disability as it affects many other already existing articles. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:09, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Okay thanks for clarifying. It's a bit confusing because for instance there is an article entitled "List of films about mathematicians" but yes I understand, it is an article and not a category. It seems that if there is an article about films about mathematicians, then there should be a similar article about films about people with disabilities, since one in six people on the planet will have a permanent or temporary disability in their lifetimes. (BTW I did post in the WikiProject Disability a few days back and hope someone there might take it upon themselves to advance the cause of a "List of films about people with disability" and television program as well.) CaptAubrey (talk) 20:25, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- By the way - Category:Films about disability is not titled "Films about people with disability" because some of its subcategories are not about people with disabilities. Categorization is somewhat of a "dark art" and takes quite a bit of experience to get it right. Roger (Dodger67) (talk)
CS1 error on Tchavdar Georgiev
[edit]Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Tchavdar Georgiev, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:21, 17 August 2023 (UTC)