Jump to content

User talk:Capitanonemo78

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notice

[edit]

stop removing the tag notability from the page Vincenzo Pastore.

Sei pregato di non rimuovere questo template usando espedienti fallaci come accuse di "vandalismo".

Anzi lo sai che ti dico ? Visti i criteri qui adottati, che resti pure la pagina, levo il tag. Se gli inglesi riterranno che non sia notabile vedranno loro. Io aggiusto il formato mettendo le categorie mancanti. --79.49.34.229 (talk) 21:22, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nemo, don't go looking for troubles even in the english language Wikipedia -- SERGIUS (CATUS NIGER) 08:56, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting own user page is considered vandalism. Next time you do I'll be reporting you for that. SERGIUS (CATUS NIGER) 14:38, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome!

Hello, Capitanonemo78, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Vejvančický (talk) 11:08, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Vincenzo Pastore requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Vejvančický (talk) 11:08, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spam

[edit]

Stop spamming the article Vincenzo Pastore. This article was deleted yesterday by DragonflySixtyseven. --95.234.191.101 (talk) 12:06, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/vincenzo pastore, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:29, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vincenzo Pastore, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:46, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Capitanonemo78. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Vincenzo Pastore".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vincenzo Pastore}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Vincenzo Pastore

[edit]

I have deleted this article under our criteria for speedy deletion. Simply put encyclopedias do not include articles on every person. Some level of notability needs to be established. It did not appear that the article made any assertion of notability. Feel free to respond here or on my talk page if you like. Chillum 18:02, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]