User talk:CapTruity

Your edits to Huskie Stadium are uneccessary. The edit made to the capacities are correct as they are backed up by the sources. Did you not read my previous post on this page. Your fixes to the capacity of Huskie Stadium are correct as backed up by the sources and ARE NOT VANDALISM. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccbbws1999 (talk • contribs) 03:33, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Hello, I'm AutomaticStrikeout. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to 2007 Northern Illinois Huskies football team because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! If you continue your actions without providing an acceptable explanation, you will be reported to the proper noticeboard(s). AutomaticStrikeout 02:05, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

Friend, you need to stop before you end up blocked. I notice that most of your edits are actually detrimental to the encyclopedia, not beneficial. Stuff like this [1] where you remove citations and DE-wikify articles, changing links from direct to a redirect, which is very unhelpful. I also see you use the word "vandalism" to describe edits that are clearly not vandalism, such as here If you need help, ask for help, but if you continue to do these kinds of edits, even one more time, you will be blocked. I hate to do it, but you are really causing a lot of disruption, even if it isn't intentional. Please consider this a final warning. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 02:32, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you are sincere about wanting to help with vandalism here, another admin suggested you look at the Wikipedia Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy. This will teach you how to do it properly, and keep you out of trouble from wrongly accusing people of vandalism. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 17:52, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for disruptive editing, including reverting valid edits that are sourced and continuously calling them vandalism.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 19:02, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked you to prevent ongoing disruption. When you get off block, I strongly suggest you take the course at Wikipedia Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy so that you will understand what vandalism is and isn't around here, else you can expect to be blocked longer next time, or for an indefinite period of time. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 19:03, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]