User talk:Cansoccerupdater

Welcome!

Hello, Cansoccerupdater, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ujama F.C., may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MicroX (talk) 21:31, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ujama F.C.

A tag has been placed on Ujama F.C. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MicroX (talk) 21:31, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Odaine Démar

The article Odaine Démar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG, and who has not played in a fully pro league, therefore failing WP:NSPORT.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:15, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Odaine Démar. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:27, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Odaine Démar. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:10, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation of Odaine Démar

Repeatedly recreating an article after it has been deleted is considered disruptive. If you continue to do so, you are liable to get yourself blocked. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:35, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have prevented the article from being created by anyone other than an administrator. Two discussions within the last 3 weeks all concluded that he did not meet the notability criteria for inclusion - please respect the community decision. As Sir Sputnik says, continuing with disruptive editing will lead to you being blocked from editing. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 03:37, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Odaine Demar

You have been warned several times about recreating this article and yet have created it yet again. This subject has been previously deleted through AfD [1]. Your edits are disruptive to Wikipedia. Please desist. Qworty (talk) 08:19, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the article, and also prevented it from re-creation apart from by administrators. I am going to block your account from editing Wikipedia for a short while, as your behaviour continues to be disruptive. A notice will be added to this page when I have done that. During your block, please consider your behaviour, and think about how you can edit in a constructive manner. Regards, PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 11:04, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 11:07, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ottawa FC for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ottawa FC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ottawa FC until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TonyStarks (talk) 05:16, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of people from Port Antonio, Jamaica

The article List of people from Port Antonio, Jamaica has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NLIST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 02:48, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of people from Port Antonio, Jamaica

The article List of people from Port Antonio, Jamaica has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:09, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]