User talk:CanonNi/Archives/AIII
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:CanonNi. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Can a museum's website be a reliable source?
Hi CanonNi, I've just noticed a review you did recently where you rejected an article in part because A museum's website is not a reliable source. Are you sure about that one, or is it that some specific museum's are not considered reliable? ϢereSpielChequers 11:46, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- @WereSpielChequers sorry for the late reply. What I meant was that particular site, Okhra, seemed to be more of a tourist attraction, rather than a proper art museum. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 01:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- No problem, I don't dispute that some museums are more credible than others, and that some museum claims are either out of date, overly nationalistic or just patriochal about their community's achievements. Just good to give that detail when communicating with article writers. ϢereSpielChequers 10:54, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Noted, thanks. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 00:58, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- No problem, I don't dispute that some museums are more credible than others, and that some museum claims are either out of date, overly nationalistic or just patriochal about their community's achievements. Just good to give that detail when communicating with article writers. ϢereSpielChequers 10:54, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
sources added
Sorry, I completely forgot to add the sources but I fixed it now! Chrisexplores01 (talk) 04:01, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Chrisexplores01 no worries. You've resubmitted the draft for reiew, and another reviewer will check it soon. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 04:03, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- thanks ! Chrisexplores01 (talk) 04:46, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Declined my sources
Hey I noticed you said some of my sources such as Instagram, TikTok and YouTube for example are not reliable. but when compared to other biographies such as Jackson Hinkle the source for his birthday is his own twitter https://x.com/jacksonhinklle/status/1835270134036090986 / this is a pretty big double standard especially when TikTok twitter and Instagram are actual sources you can't just say they're not just cause its social media. I don't know how twitter and TikTok are at different levels of quality when it's both someone saying the same thing but in different media formats. I did review the notability requirements for people and i will definitely add some more sources showing why he's notable for now I'll give you some examples here. Eddie was in a jubilee video with 1.3 million views, a debate with well-known twitch streamer vaush 241k views and a debate with another well-known streamer Destiny (streamer)426k views Gingercom1 (talk) 04:32, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Gingercom1 social media may, if there are no better sources, be used to verify basic information. They do not establish notablility. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 04:41, 10 November 2024 (UTC)