User talk:CanonLawJunkie/Archive/2019

Outline of Catholic canon law moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Outline of Catholic canon law, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:24, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Let it be known that I think the article is helpful as is, and the topic already meets the "general notability guideline" due to other articles being about this topic--and should not be moved to draftspace. This is a list-style article. It doesn't need "sources and citations" because it is a list-style outline type article.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 16:16, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

At this point in the discussion I am going to put this on the noticeboard.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 15:56, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your assessment, although I wasn't going to move it, since I'm a bit biased (lol). Thanks! Canon Law Junkie §§§ Talk 01:32, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Age of consent Vatican City

I request your thoughts in this talk page Talk:Ages of consent in Europe#Vatican City.Manabimasu (talk) 16:23, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have time to actually contribute to the article, but I left links to the original civil laws (in English) from Vatican.va and VaticanState.va. I hope that's helpful to you! Canon Law Junkie §§§ Talk 23:08, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Outline of Catholic canon law

Hello, CanonLawJunkie,

Thanks for creating Outline of Catholic canon law! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 16:58, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Regulæ Juris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abrogation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Law of New Hampshire

Hello, CanonLawJunkie,

Thanks for creating Law of New Hampshire! I edit here too, under the username QueerEcofeminist and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add valid, reliable references to this article. thanks

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|QueerEcofeminist}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 11:12, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Institutes of the Roman Curia has been nominated for discussion

Category:Institutes of the Roman Curia, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:21, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Academic journals associated with Catholic University of America has been nominated for discussion

Category:Academic journals associated with Catholic University of America, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 20:38, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:School of Canon Law

Hi, I get it that there's only one such a school in the US. However, the English WP covers worldwide. Are there no such schools in other countries? If not, fine, but if there are, this cat should be renamed Catholic University of America School of Canon Law. CHeers! --Randykitty (talk) 14:37, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner. Actually, it is the only "school of canon law". The technical term for an academic department of canon law is "faculty of canon law", not "school". Catholic University of America uses "School" because of the Anglo-American university "School" system, "School of Law" name convention, etc. Every other faculty of canon law is called Faculty of Canon Law, Institute of Canon Law, or some such similar name (cf. Pontificia Università Gregoriana Facoltà di Diritto Canonico, Canon Law Faculties and Institutes). Therefore I oppose the renaming as unnecessary. Canon Law Junkie §§§ Talk 15:17, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:School of Canon Law has been nominated for discussion

Category:School of Canon Law, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 10:40, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All rights reserved

Fair enough! I hadn't seen your addition of Category:Copyright law legal terminology, since it was more than a week earlier. Thanks for including the explanation in your edit summary. TJRC (talk) 05:32, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being an understanding Wikipedian! :) Canon Law Junkie §§§ Talk 05:37, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:School of Canon Law alumni has been nominated for discussion

Category:School of Canon Law alumni, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 16:29, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Catholic University of America schools of law has been nominated for discussion

Category:Catholic University of America schools of law, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 16:34, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi CanonLawJunkie/Archive/2019,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:38, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi CanonLawJunkie/Archive/2019,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi CanonLawJunkie/Archive/2019,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:40, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 US Banknote Contest

US Banknote Contest

November-December 2019

There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.

In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate.

If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Vatican City sidebar

Template:Vatican City sidebar has been nominated for merging with Template:Politics of Vatican City. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 01:06, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]