User talk:CanonLawJunkie/Archive/2018

copy vios?

Hi, before I tag / speedy delete request - I thought it best to ask. Three new articles you main-spaced Censure (canon law), Bigamy (canon law), Contract (canon law) appear to be mostly copied from http://www.newadvent.org - [1], [2], [3]. Is there an innocent explanation here? If so, it should probably be noted clearly on the articles in question since I won't be the only one who asks.Icewhiz (talk) 08:45, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Icewhiz: I am aware of the copyrighted nature of New Advent's transcriptions of the now public-domain Old Catholic Encyclopedia. I copied these articles (and edited them) from WikiSource ( https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Catholic_Encyclopedia_(1913)/Bigamy_(in_Canon_Law) https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Catholic_Encyclopedia_(1913)/Contract https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Catholic_Encyclopedia_(1913)/Ecclesiastical_Censures and duly cited this fact using the {{catholic}} template, found in the "Bibliography" section of each page in question. There was no violation of copyright, and a purposeful effort to the contrary. Canon Law Junkie §§§ Talk 03:42, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. My bad for not noticing this is public domain.Icewhiz (talk) 04:57, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Icewhiz: It's all good. Thank you for your vigilance regarding copyright infringement, a matter which I take most seriously. Canon Law Junkie §§§ Talk 00:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

<font face="Old English text MT"> [[User:CanonLawJunkie|Canon Law Junkie]] </font>§§§ <font face="Old English text MT">[[User talk: CanonLawJunkie|Talk]]</font>

: Canon Law Junkie §§§ Talk

to

<span style="font-family: Old English text MT"> [[User:CanonLawJunkie|Canon Law Junkie]] </span>§§§ <span style="font-family: Old English text MT">[[User talk: CanonLawJunkie|Talk]]</span>

: Canon Law Junkie §§§ Talk

—Anomalocaris (talk) 18:57, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Most users are updating their signatures as requested. We hope you will also. —Anomalocaris (talk) 02:39, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.[reply]

Have your say!

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

schismatic Catholic priest, c. 1970s

Perhaps you would be willing to take a look at Donald Sanborn after the AfD ends. thanks . E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:41, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CanonLawJunkie. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Canon law legal terminology has been nominated for discussion

Category:Canon law legal terminology, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:56, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]