User talk:Canol

Port Talbot docks

Hi, thanks for making the correction about the dwt. Here was my source about Port Talbot being on the Severn Estuary ABP: Port Talbot. There is a line in the wikipedia severn estuary article that states: "Sometimes the term Severn Estuary refers to a geographically wider area, stretching from Gloucester to west Wales and Devon." but I am not looking to dispute the more common definition. Shakey123 (talk) 23:17, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for your information about these waterways. 81.103.163.233 (talk) 08:38, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Yateley Road

A tag has been placed on Yateley Road requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. robwingfield ^«T•C» 16:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speed Limit

Sorry I don't remember doing this. Which page is this meant to be on? Welshleprechaun (talk) 01:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't remove any information, just added the info about Cardiff Airport. Although I'm sure your edits are of good faith, I've reverted your edit because Swansea Airport doesn't offer any scheduled flights and Bristol Airport serves the South West of England, regardless of its usage by Welsh passengers and I think it's quite obvious that people of Port Talbot would use Cardiff Airport rather than drive the extra hour and a half to Bristol. Welshleprechaun (talk) 01:10, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe ok. All the best Welshleprechaun (talk) 01:28, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Swansea

I, and I'm sure most editors agree, think that it was irrelevant to the Swansea article. The information could apply to lots of similar articles but I think it belongs on a more specific page. Welshleprechaun (talk) 00:42, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The matter is up for discussion on talk page. Also, because of the limited local media in Swansea, it would not qualify for an article of its own. Welshleprechaun (talk) 01:43, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not "stalking" you, Swansea is on my watchlist. Welshleprechaun (talk) 13:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TOISAs

Hopefully you're happy with my latest edit - I was mainly unhappy with the "only known example" wording, which you have now half-conceded was wrong. There are several acronym-within-acronym examples used by the military (e.g. RAM, and LADAR (see entry under LIDAR). I also removed the bit about GNU because I think the difference between recursive and non-recursive acronyms is a bit too far off-topic for a page on TESSAs!!92.2.101.135 (talk) 14:23, 28 April 2008 (UTC) All agreed, thanks. Why don't you register though? Canol (talk) 19:05, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

South Wales

I don't disagree that south Wales simply means the southern half of Wales. However if you actually read the South Wales article you are trying to link to, this is not what it is describing and the definition of the area is expressed in general terms and I don't believe it can be made NPOV. Also linking like this implies that "South Wales" is a country or some officialy named area with the "South" in capitals. I've changed it to south Wales - hopefully this is a fair compromise. Weisinger (talk) 07:15, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to add, there are also articles on Mid Wales and West Wales among other articles. I've noticed in the past that places like Carmarthen, and even places as far west as Aberystwyth are linked to South Wales. Many people would argue that these are more commonly thought of as being in West Wales. For modern policy purposes, the Welsh Assembly Government specifies areas such as South West Wales and South East Wales. Why should special emphasis be put on a generally specified area such as "South Wales" by linking to it in this way? Can you show me lots articles being linked to an article about the southern part of a country in other countries? Also, if you are saying that "South Wales" has a solid definition, then perhaps you might like to amend the South Wales article accordingly.

I have no disagreement with your point about geography and think it is fine to simply say south, east, west, southwest etc. in describing where a place is in a country in the place articles. My main concern is to link to articles like "South Wales", "West Wales" etc. which describe areas that don't strictly correlate to a purely geographical compass definition. Weisinger (talk) 09:13, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, thanks for your last message. I emphasize that I don't think we have a disagreement over compass points and I totally agree with you about news reports saying south of France etc. To state again, my concern was linking to the South Wales article - if you read this article, the area it is describing does not correlate to the obvious compass area (i.e. simply the southern half of Wales) that most people would be expecting, the article makes a loose definition of an area around the M4 corridor, which could cause confusion. There are other problems with linking to this article. One is that there are areas like West Wales and South East Wales which fall within or overlap the area described in the South Wales article, which could lead to more confusion. I think it is OK to explain that a place may belong to these roughly defined regions in the body of the article but it is not appropriate in the lead line, since the guide on writing about settlements stipulates that the lead should say the modern county and constituent country. The third issue is that "South Wales" is neither a country or a county. Note that many of the links used the capital S in "South Wales", which could imply that "South Wales" could be a province or state in Wales, like New South Wales in Australia. I hope this has cleared up any misunderstanding of this issue between us. I will work on adding maps to these articles in the future - this would be much clearer to people than rough descriptions like north/south etc. Weisinger (talk) 08:29, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meaning of Community

Hi again. I know what you are getting at in your edits in Baglan Bay but I think there is a bit of confusion here. There is more than one meaning of the word community. In the Baglan Bay article it means the Community in the local government sense, which is the Welsh equivalent of a civil parish in England. See the article Community (Wales) for an explanation. If you want to continue this discussion, please post on the Baglan Bay article talk page at Talk:Baglan Bay. Cheers. Weisinger (talk) 19:47, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Corus

You got the discussion you wanted [[1]] Steel2009 (talk) 02:57, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Steel2009 (talk) 22:50, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sport in Swansea

Thanks for the note. I would suggest embedding in the text itself. The most notable think about Swansea and the national football team is probably that the national side has played games in Swansea as a home ground. Only a few grounds in Wales can boast that. FruitMonkey (talk) 17:57, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response, I put it in the body of the text on 16th Jan and you did not delete it so I assume we have agreement. Canol (talk)

Di Botcher

Thanks for your note. If Di Botcher is notable enough, then the logical step is to start an article in the English Wikipedia (that could then be linked with the French version). Paul W (talk) 06:50, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page formating

Please follow the talk page indenting convention so that discussions in which you participate are easier to read. -AndrewDressel (talk) 16:04, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link, I will try to comply in future Canol (talk) 17:26, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Defiance cycle ride

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Defiance cycle ride, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Qxukhgiels (talk) 21:15, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Defiance Cycle Company has been accepted

Defiance Cycle Company, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

AndrewDressel (talk) 15:36, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Defiance cycle ride, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. I'm going to submit this to AfD, as I don't see this meeting WP:NEVENT Qxukhgiels (talk) 21:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC) Qxukhgiels (talk) 21:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I thought I had only removed the Orphan tag as the article is not now an orphan, someone has included a link to it. I was not aware I had removed any deletion tags, in fact, this is the first time I noticed one on there. Canol (talk) 22:11, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Defiance cycle ride for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Defiance cycle ride is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defiance cycle ride until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Qxukhgiels (talk) 21:14, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not contest a deletion at the AfD talk page. Please do so at the article's talk page. As far as I can see, however, this is not notable per [{WP:NEVENT]] & WP:GNG. You state that it has been "linked to by others." I assume this means mentioned in multiple sources. If so, they are probably not reliable. WP:LOTSOFSOURCES is not an argument to use. Also, if this event has "lasting historical significance," you're going to have to show this with reliable sources, and as I've already mentioned, there do not appear to be many. The company has been determined as notable, but using it as an argument just because of its significance is a use of WP:OTHERSTUFF, another argument that should be avoided.Qxukhgiels (talk) 01:08, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is not clear, should it be discussed here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defiance cycle ride as per the first request above, or here the article's talk page as per the second one? Canol (talk) 22:35, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You could try either one, but in cases as this, it is usually done on the article's talk page. However, say, do you disagree with one's viewpoint at the AfD, that would be the place to do it.Qxukhgiels (talk) 00:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to List of onomatopoeias

Hi, I reverted your recent edit to #a because it seemed like you were treating Wikipedia as a crystal ball; that is, a new not-yet-notable word should not be on that list. If I was mistaken, please let me know on my talk page. Thank you! --L235 (talk) Ping when replying 03:43, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Response Left on your talk page. Canol (talk) 13:39, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Canol. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Canol. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Victoria Pendleton, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 11:03, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment here. I stated in my content change that this was a true story reported in all the national press. It would be far more helpful in future if, instead of deleting contribution, you could perhaps just add the citation for me. Canol (talk) 23:20, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Canol. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]