User talk:CanadianBiographies111

Images

Canadian, the files were "prodded" on 6 September, so if you've sent the e-mail two days later, it should be OK. I can't check it, but I have some experience with this procedure, and it has always worked well. The correct procedure is described in the "How to Obtain a Free Image" guide, check it, please. We'll see. --Vejvančický (talk) 07:09, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, CanadianBiographies111. You have new messages at BlazerKnight's talk page.
Message added 22:41, 2 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

BlazerKnight (talk) 22:41, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have new messages

Hello, CanadianBiographies111. You have new messages at BlazerKnight's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

BlazerKnight (talk) 08:19, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Harry and Martha Cohen

"this editor has embarked upon a vendetta aimed against Wiki listings of Harry/Martha Cohen upon her death, yesterday, on specious and inappropriate grounds"

If you believe such nonsense go to ANI and file a complaint. What I have done is edit the articles without fear or favor and removed a lot of blatant POV text. Quis separabit? 13:14, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RE Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, I see no entry regarding myself. You likely did it wrong. I suggest you reconsider your behavior in attempting to file a frivolous complaint regarding articles in which you appear to have a conflict of interest. Quis separabit? 13:56, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As I stated in another note, I am NOT a Wiki expert, by any means, but I have more understanding than the mostly older people who requested I provide the material to the various edits I've made, under various Wiki IDs. If you remove a listing, it is a negative reflection upon me, and ergo, that is the primary source of my "heat." But, in the end analysis, I've done as much as I can-- and I suppose you and your editor friends will do whatever you choose. I did my best, that's all I can do. Thank you.CanadianBiographies111 (talk) 14:37, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on the improved quality of your editing but try not to get so touchy whenever something is not up to par. BTW: Any chance of finding out the birth dates (i.e. month and day, not just year) of the Cohens? Might be nice to include. Yours, Quis separabit? 23:58, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliment. I am a very infrequent "hobbyist" Wiki editor at best and have a hell of a lot to learn to gain the kind of proficiency that you and others have. When Wiki objects to material I place here, then expunges it, thereafter, I typically receive a "scolding" from those who asked me to serve as their proxy. I agree that I need to be less reactive but when I often spend some 2 hrs on a single listing and then have most of what I placed erased, then it is frustrating, given that I typically do this only as a favor to those who have no computer skill of any kind. With respect to actual literal birth dates, nobody seems to know, since it appears that many of these older folks birthed prior to the Depression (1929)had parents who had large families (6-10 kids) and never paid close attention to the actual birth date of each child.

CanadianBiographies111 (talk) 00:36, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It varies from country to country, IMO, Ireland has limited reference sources and often even years and places of birth and death are hazy. The UK, the US, and the Philippines seem to be largely the opposite. Canada is somewhere in the middle. Quis separabit? 01:25, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RE Martha Cohen

Yeah, I don't really care. Unless you have been expressly blocked or banned from editing the article, you are free to update it, but keep in mind the rules and policies regarding biographical articles. Yours, Quis separabit? 20:52, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Freedom of the City recipients

added links pointing to John Bennett, John Henderson, Jack Diamond, Stanley Smith, George Cunningham, Edward Beatty and Thomas McDonald

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, CanadianBiographies111. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, CanadianBiographies111. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Carl Safran for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carl Safran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Safran until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Softlavender (talk) 03:39, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]