User talk:Camimack
Hi, I have multiple blocks on my account with no explanation! I last edited a day ago and when I click on my edit it shows up with Chill89 as the editor. Did my account get usurped by Chill89? I am quite confused. Any insights would be appreciated. Thank you
Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot
[edit]
|
Hi Camimack! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Hello, I made an edit yesterday and when I checked on it today it is under another editor's name. That would be fine with me but now I have multiple blocks on my account for the next 9 months with no explanation. What can I do? Thank you Camimack (talk) 15:30, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Belardinelli (October 28)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Daniel Belardinelli.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hasteur (talk) 14:42, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at AfC Daniel Belardinelli was accepted
[edit]
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Green Cardamom (talk) 05:03, 18 November 2013 (UTC)October 2015
[edit]
Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Daniel Belardinelli without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 11:16, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest
[edit] Hello, Camimack. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Daniel Belardinelli , you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
- avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
- instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
- when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 02:16, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
no coi Camimack (talk) 08:20, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
April 2017
[edit]
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Robert Sundholm, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Toddst1 (talk) 02:23, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Daniel Belardinelli shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Toddst1 (talk) 02:27, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
I did not consider what I wrote about Robert Sundholm defamatory and it was already in print, but I have deferred to your wiki experienced judgement. Regarding the article on artist Daniel Belardinelli, my intention was not an editing war and I apologize for that apparent appearance. Camimack (talk) 08:30, 29 April 2017 (UTC)