User talk:Cameronarndt

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Cameronarndt/sandbox (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cameronarndt/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Anne Delong (talk) 15:16, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Cameronarndt, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Deletion discussion about 67th Expeditionary Signal Battalion

Hello, Cameronarndt,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether 67th Expeditionary Signal Battalion should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/67th Expeditionary Signal Battalion .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, C1776M ^Talk 11:12, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Thank you for your recent contributions. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. I've noticed you've created severl pages here, here, and here that are virtually blank, and the page referenced above is copied from another website. I'd suggest creating articles in your sandbox until they're ready for publication. Thanks! C1776M ^Talk 11:32, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I propose you move all three pages to your sandbox until they can be further deveoloped then move back to Article namespace when they're ready. Let me know on my talk page if you need assistance doing this. Thanks. C1776M ^Talk 11:52, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 67th Expeditionary Signal Battalion

Hello Cameronarndt,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 67th Expeditionary Signal Battalion for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. C1776M ^Talk 17:19, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright warning

Hello Cameronarndt, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to 63rd Expeditionary Signal Battalion has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. This is the second article you've copied from another website. Please make sure you read and fully understand the policies before adding more content. Thanks, and please stick around and keep creating articles! Thank you. C1776M ^Talk 22:55, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 51st Expeditionary Signal Battalion

Hello, Cameronarndt. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, 51st Expeditionary Signal Battalion, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 10:18, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 50th Expeditionary Signal Battalion

Hello, Cameronarndt. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, 50th Expeditionary Signal Battalion, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 10:19, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 44th Signal Battalion

Hello, Cameronarndt

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username SunDawn, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, 44th Signal Battalion, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:14, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Signal Battalions

Template:Signal Battalions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 18:32, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]