User talk:Camero-Belter

Tarl Warwick and the need for reliable, independent sources

Hi, Camero-Belter, welcome to Wikipedia! I'm going to leave a welcome template below this message that has a lot of useful links. I noticed your first article, Tarl Warwick, and I wanted to draw your attention to an issue with the article. See, for a person (or other topic) to qualify for a Wikipedia article, you must show that person meets Wikipedia's notability guideline. Basically, this means that you have to show that Warwick has been written about in depth in reliable, independent sources, such as newspapers, magazines, or reputable websites with editorial oversight. Currently, your article doesn't cite any such sources, just Warwick's own websites and profiles. If such sources aren't added, your article may be nominated for deletion. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 19:00, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Camero-Belter. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions. My name is Howicus, and I've been an editor here for some time. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

If you're working on creating a new article, you should take a look at this page on your first article, and use the article wizard here to get started. Also, this page has instructions on how to cite sources, complete with videos.

If all this Wikicode is a little overwhelming, this cheatsheet may help untangle it.

If you're looking for a tutorial of sorts, The Wikipedia Adventure is a good option.

And if you need more help, I'd recommend getting live help at the Wikipedia help chat channel: click here to join. Additionally, you could ask me on my talk page, try the Teahouse (a help page for new users) or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, welcome, and have fun editing! Howicus (Did I mess up?) 19:00, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tarl Warwick

The article Tarl Warwick has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not appear to meet the notability guidelines for people as there is no substantial coverage of them in independent, reliable sources. Books are self-published and not widely reviewed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joe Roe (talk) 09:54, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tarl Warwick for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tarl Warwick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarl Warwick until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joe Roe (talk) 01:24, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Greater Equatorial Guinea

The article Greater Equatorial Guinea has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Funke (talk) 22:33, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you faking sources?

Through a search of WorldCat and Google, it appears that the two sources you used when creating Greater Equatorial Guinea were faked. I am flagging the piece as a hoax, pending your clarification. If you have faked sources elsewhere your time here will be very, very short. Please show evidence that both the book and the article actually exist. Carrite (talk) 17:21, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've brought this matter to the RELIABLE SOURCES NOTICEBOARD, please address my concerns there. Thank you. Carrite (talk) 17:39, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Greater Equatorial Guinea

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Greater Equatorial Guinea, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 17:49, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]