User talk:CambridgeBayWeather/Archive14

DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.

Re: Edmonton City Centre (Blatchford Field) Airport

You wrote:

Do you have any idea what the releationship is between Edmonton Airports and ATCO Frontec? The Canada Flight Supplement says that ATCO is the operator and the two web sites don't really help. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 08:44, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As someone who works at said airport, all I know is that ATCO Frontec has a contract to provide maintenance services for the airfield, such as snow removal, grass cutting, etc. The airport itself is operated by the Edmonton Airport Authority. Ditar (Talk) 20:18, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your interference in Turkey talk page.

Please be careful. With this edit you removed someones comments. Also please be aware that new comments go at the bottom and not the top. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 15:24, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

I dont think it is for you to wipe others bottom. Mind your own next time. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 172GAL (talk • contribs) 16:58, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

On the User_talk:172GAL it SEEMS that what you said was slightly different in that you deemed the word comments i.e. the words "(calling them comments is an overflattery)" has been added by User:172GAL in this edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A172GAL&diff=86213514&oldid=85423410 sorry if you picked up the previous version by me commenting on this difference: I see now that it is our blocked user who has altered your comments. There must be a Wikipolicy about that ! Ttiotsw 20:46, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Margaret Rudkin

Used spell check here and fixed spelling. Should be fine now. -WarthogDemon 07:22, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian Water Aerodromes

CBW, I saw your message on Eagle 101's page about the bot work. We're currently running the bot through all articles in {{airport-stub}} and all subs, adding |class=Stub|importance=.

I realize that they're all low priority, but since the bot is just starting its run of over 2000+ articles and has a high counter, it'll take a while. In the mean time, I used AWB to make a list and filtered out all non-water aerodromes. I'll be tagging them momentarily.

If you'd like to chat, we have an IRC channel that we monitor pretty reliably. You can find us on irc.freenode.net in #wikipedia-spam (channel for an anti-linkspam bot we're all working on) and #wikipedia-spam-t (the unflooded talk channel). Eagle asked me to invite you himself, so apparently he thinks your cooperation would be quite rewarding. Thanks! thadius856_talk 20:55, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Standard infobox for weather averages

Hello CambridgeBay,
I created a standard infobox for weather averages for a location. Can you take a look at it and let me know what you think (here or the template talk page). It is called Template:Infobox Weather. The only place that I have used it is Toronto. Thanks. —MJCdetroit 02:53, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Question

I am curious as to what terms the Fat Sally page violated/did not adhere to which was cause for deletion.

Low Visibility Operations at BRS

Your advice please. I can see an edit war starting about the relative merits of easyJet and BA Connect aircraft and their merits as appplied to operations at BRS.

Your thought on the matters would be of use. I have difficulty seeing this a balance without equal treatment being applied to other airlines (and at other airports!!)

Have a look at what I have posted at Talk:BA_Connect#Low_Visibility_Operations_at_BRS; User talk:JulianHensey and User talk:192.149.117.69

== Stewart 18:52, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

en-admins

CBW, I was just going to reply to you on Lar's page, but when I saw his last remark I figured this was a better place for it. You don't need any human help to get into the admin channel. If you're registered to services, just type "/msg chanserv invite #wikipedia-en-admins" and an automatic invite should appear (since you're an admin). Double-click on the invite and you're in. Best, Bishonen | talk 19:34, 7 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]

NovaJet editor

Hi CambridgeBayWeather,

I've noticed that you've been removing edits by 70.54.215.245, which has basically been additions of the company "Novajet" to airports around Canada. It seems to be a means of adding publicity. I don't know if you've bothered to check, but that IP address returns to the physical location of the company Novajet. As you may be more experienced with Wikipedia than I, is there a way of blocking this IP for both the use of self-promotion and adding information that isn't true? (I live in Oshawa, where the Oshawa Airport is located, and I can guarantee you they don't fly out of there). Cheers. Derekwriter 01:53, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Iqaluit council

this new council took office on November 6, 2006 at 12:00 noon. 216.108.29.22 15:29, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Iqaluit council

Section 14 of the Cities Towns and Villages Act is pretty clear on the issue. I know in Cam Bay the Hamlets Act has different dates, but Iqaluit is not Cambridge Bay, and is not subject to the Hamlets Act. Please see today's Nunatsiaq News.216.108.29.22 16:48, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VP Glitch

Haven't seen it do that yet? Thanks for the cover! I have noticed every now and then it freezes up and vandalism warnings(if I don't catch it when it happens) sit for a half an hour or more before saving. I find I am using VP as a "pre-viewer" and then using popups and ARV to do the rest. I will try to back-track on changes to see that it doesn't do that again. Again thanks, cheers and take care! Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 19:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of all edits by IP: 140.247.205.55 in Montreal article.

Just to say that you should check the previous edits before reverting everything. The Economy/Sovereignty movement subsection is subject to contention as it mixes a history and politics lesson (of dubious value due to the constant edit wars) to what should be a neutral description (whatever that is) of the current state of the economy of Montreal.--Boffob 19:49, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FlyMonarchVirtual

Hey, I put FlyMonarchVirtual up for deletion and you removed it. Cool. Except User:Joshrice is back at it again. Just FYI. --Brad Beattie ^(talk) 15:08, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi u there? i need to ask a question.Plz reply.

i have a query regarding uploading a photograph for a wikipedia already existing article. But i lifted that Photograph from an Orkut user's personal album without her knowing . So what should i write in the description,image tag, etc. to upload that image. Please help. Waiting for your reply.

Sorry i cant give you the link as now i have deleted my Orkut account due to academic reasons so now i have that photo stored in my gmail account which i can forward to you.http://mail.google.com/mail/?ik=5740323a5f&view=att&th=10d646c7b7550ee9&attid=0.1

you can see the image:- File:29755625.jpg

Thanks . bye.

User:MakuOnline

He has also edited links to Venom, and is trying to create a link to the spiderman preview in the new article. Just lookin' out and thought'd you'd like to know V. Joe 16:33, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, but those links were not spam on the skateboarding page, Quarter Snacks for example lists many spots to skate in New York City (which happens to be one of the centers of skateboarding). It also shows videos and photos of trips and etc) This is not SPAM it is a resource for skaters to see whats going on in t the new york scene.

I will be REPOSTING that link because it is a viable resrouce for skaters who visit and live in in NYC .

Thank you for your understanding.

-prdx

Re. Soap opera popular couples

Thank you for contacting me. I'll keep an eye on him to see if he continues in this manner. Regards.--Hús ö nd 23:40, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weather

While reading through the posts at the Ref Desk, I followed a link to Victoria Island (Canada) and now I realize just how far north you live. My first reaction was "Holy crap!" This lead me to wonder, how many months of actual summer time weather do you get up there? Dismas|^(talk) 10:35, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link. I'm certain that I couldn't live there for more than a year... Must take a certain breed of person. A number of other questions have come to mind but I don't want to bore you and like you, I edit from work, so I've got things to attend to. Thanks again for that link. Dismas|^(talk) 11:13, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deeleted article

hi, I'm morrision my article has been deleted for copyright violation [The article has been deleted because it was copied from here. Please read Wikipedia:Copyrights. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 13:00, 11 November 2006 (UTC)]

I want to request you plz up this article because i'm authorized by ISF to put this article here. Thanks for your kind consideration.

Thankyou

Thankyou for your cheerful and benevolent addition to my talk page. Rugby 666

Afd for airline destinations

Someone nominated airline destinations for afd again. I thought you might be interested. DB (talk) 20:03, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Need assistance about removing the link in wikipedia about my company

Hi! I had entered a query on wikipedia. wikipedia username: aleemsoft.

I want to delete the query and the response from you. This link is appearing when we search "AASHMAM" using search on google.com

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather/Archive11

Aashmam is the company for which i work, and i dont want this link to appear on the google. Please suggest how to remove this link.

I tried to edit the content on this page but its not working. May be because its written "DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE."

Please see that the posting about AAshmam on this link is removed.

Thanks and Regards, Abdul Aleem.

mamta.narang@aashmam.com aleem4all@yahoo.com

EEEK, selective deletion in a history. I'm not sure if it can be done short of deleting the entire archives or having a dev run a selective DB query -- Tawker 13:44, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Barry, (playwright)

Could you help me move Kevin Barry, (playwright) to Kevin Barry (playwright) please? semper fi — Moe 08:36, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! :) semper fi — Moe 08:48, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for telling me about the redirect :) semper fi — Moe 08:51, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks....again

Thanks for the catch. I'm just going to "pop 'em back" when I catch it from now on. While I have your attention...I have read bits n blurbs on different discussion pages about the "Barney/Disney/Sesame Street" vandal. You seem to be on top of it most of the time. If you have the chance could you enlighten me as to why these pages pop up so often...with the same repeat edits...in my VP window in the first place. Again, thanks cheers and take care! Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 13:25, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Award

The Khan Beshov Award

Given to CambridgeBayWeather, for there contribution to Khan Beshov's page. —Intergr8;φ 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Move page

I have made a big mistake on i page that i have started few months ago. I wanted to creat to creat a double redirects on Sacad to Sacad Siciid, however it seems that i have made a mistake during the process in which the edit history was lost.

I hope it can be re-treaved.

Re: Zack Husayn

My goodness. There has been a real flare-up concerning various Somali clan-related articles over the past two or three days. I had to leave a round of 3RR warnings concerning a few other articles on Friday evening. Maybe I'm missing something really obvious (it's the middle of the night and I couldn't sleep), but I can't really find a policy concerning inflammatory statements (e.g. [1],[2]) (other than NPOV or citing references). "No personal attacks" and "be civil" seem to be related to interactions between specific editors, and not ethnic slurs (and I can't see those edits as anything else). I'll leave some comments for the user. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 09:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like I am watching a turf war (I just don't know how else to describe it) being played out in these articles. (You and I have watched this sort of thing happen on-and-off for about one year now but, like I said, it has really flared up very recently.) My feeling now is that there's no reason to keep any edit, particularly an inflammatory one, without a source, which seems to jibe with policy anyway. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 09:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Someone keeps reverting, destroying information or adding nonsence information in Hawiye, Sacad, Habar Gider and Saleebaan articals, can you do some thing about this?

Re: Having fun?

Thanks for handling that, I've had more time for WP recently but I had to sleep at some point. I probably should have left a msg. at WP:AN or similar in case someone else could keep an eye on it, but it seems there were already too many (and bigger) things to worry about. I ended up just leaving a note at Wikipedia talk:Africa-related regional notice board#Edit war at Somali clan articles. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 18:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

United Kingdom Aeronautical Information Publication

I think ColinFine's comment on Leeds Bradford International Airport has merit. As it stands the United Kingdom Aeronautical Information Publication link as a reference is useless - it does not identify how to verify the information, it does not say which volume, which year, etc. If it is a reference then it needs to be formatted properly so people can use it to verify info in the article. Thanks/wangi 12:06, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That was precisely my issue - it was like citing (the home page of) a newspaper's website as a reference for a news article. But you have improved it now - thanks. --ColinFine 00:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, I hadn't seen the item on User talk:Wangi. I was actually baffled by the original link: it seemed to point to something that ought somehow to have some relevant information, but I had no idea what information or how to get at it. That was why I removed it. --ColinFine 00:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Explain deletion of "memorability" please

Recently the article for "memorability" was deleted as spam. Can you please elaborate on this deletion, as it is not spam and is relevant to domainers and domain name appraisals.

Thanks!

Explain deletion of Marvin Heemeyer from the Folk hero article please

I have reverted your deletion and left an explanation on the Talk Page. Please note that I am not one of those who see Heemeyer as a martyr. However, IMO, I think he is seen as some by as a folk hero. If you do not believe that he warrants mention on the Folk hero page, then it is incumbent on you to explain why on the Talk Page. Thanks.

--Richard 19:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please could you fix your eyes on Saleebaan article, because a bunch of guys with clannish and hatred prejudice are constantly attempting to badly edit all the time. I can understand their motive, for they dislike the Saleebaan clan and its nobility to be seen here. It's indeed remorseful if any chauvanist could change whatever he wants!

Deletion of "memorability" response

CambridgeBayWeather, I understand your argument for thinking that the article posting was "soliciting", however that it is very incorrect. We weren't soliciting, but we do want to receive just notariety for using terms in pioneering ways.

Not to mention that their was essentially no research done to see if people "are using the term" or not. If one would have taken the time to look into the matter before it was deleted (very quickly at that), you'd see that quite a few professionals have cited the term (and the guide, which I linked to in the article for reference accuracy...not publicity!) on their sites and blogs.

Uses of the term "memorability" regarding domain names

I understand and agree with "policing" the wiki for blatant misuse, but we don't think we were violating the spirit of the rule any more than their being a whole article on "McDonald's". (Now there is some blatant advertising. Don't people think we all know what McDonald's is already? Why can't people learn something new from Wikipedia!?!)

We are very interested in re-entering the term in the future. (We think we'll re-edit to make it more "wiki-friendly")

Thanks for your understanding!

Vandalism report

New vandalism by User:Ritchie4002 in Karl Marx.

Please revert MY edit there, because I forgot I am currently operating from a "filtered" Internet access that truncated several words. Sorry for the inconvenience. Randroide 15:34, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: The Older Gamers and it's deletion

If the article itself hadn't been deleted in such an offhanded fashion, the deleter may well have seen some change in the disposition of the content.

I was in fact in the process of changing the article to be a social and historical account of The Older Gamers.

The article was intended to be a stub, which may then have been edited by other users.

I find myself disappointed by the draconian nature of this wikipedia 'editor'.

Pharrisee 14:13, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As was mentioned in the deleted talk page for the article, that content was not even a place holder it was placed there simply as a reference for myself while creating correct content.

If your hadn't deleted it so out of hand you would have seen it dramatically changed in the very next edition of the page.

I have to say once again that I am very disappointed in the manner in which you handled this matter.

The breakneck speed in which you deleted both the article and it's talk page, leaving no chance for discussion, is almost beyond belief.

Pharrisee 14:27, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: The Older Gamers

I would have thought that the message that another user was editing this article was enough to cause some thought in the process of deleting the article.

Unless your user status removes that warning?

The fact of not knowing whether someone was editing the article is my whole point, you didn't allow the article to live for long enough to allow any editing, you simply deleted it, no discussion allowed!

I appreciate the fact that you have a job to do, but you didn't allow discussion where relevant facts may have been brought to light.

1. I am a member of The Older Gamers 2. Not just a member, I am a Squad Leader 3. I have no gain from the running and promotion of TOG

You'll hear no-more from me on this subject, I merely felt that these facts should be brought to light.

Prominent figures in Somali clans

Hi CambridgeBayWeather, I saw you working on some of the Somali clan articles and was wondering what you thought about the Prominent figures sections. (For example:Habar Gedir) Many of the names listed are living. It isn't simply a list of names, and there are claims attached. None of the claims are cited. I asked the people at WPtalk:V if I should erase them or what and they said it was a judgement call. What do you think? Should we remove all comments and just list names only until reliable sources are cited? --Electric Eye (talk) 12:05, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Samek

Looks like you deleted the article i wrote on Jesse Samek, he is noticable in the U.S. Air Force and is in our official publication of military history. I don't think I need to discuss what the publication is due to it being military, but I believe the article should be undeleted. I was trying to make this article to expand U.S. Air Force military history.

Tnx

Thanks for your pair of edits, tho they caused me some head-scratching & tentative indignation, until i regained my otherwise firm grasp of the obvious, that you meant my user page and not the IP user's talk page. It appeared at first that you thot the blowback about these edits was credible enuf that you didn't want me to miss it by not following the IP's talk page! [grin]
--Jerzy•t 17:51, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saying hello

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 July 7 -- The six military airfield templates that you created are up for deletion as I can't see that they are being used. Please see the above link. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC) Yes, I'm glad you did this as I decided that I was getting in over my head. Thanks. Interestingly I have perused your user page and contributions in the past... great stuff. I've always been interested in the arctic... when I was in the Air Force I actually put in Thule AB on my "dream sheet"; didn't get the assignment though as I think the Danes were running the weather facilities by that time. -Timvasquez 17:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nunavut general election, 1999

Looks fine to me... I've just formatted the links useing {{cite web}}. On a related note, I'm considering putting List of Nunavut general elections up for Featured list status... what do you think? Tompw

OK, I've nominated it. Tompw (talk) 16:14, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Flag icons

It's an uphill battle... I feel like many editors add them because it gives them something to do. Stupid things like this make me want to give up on Wikipedia. – flamurai (t) 04:02, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

With all apologies, I've reverted your edit to William Shatner. Wikipedia:Don't overuse flags is an essay, not a guideline or policy, and I've been involved in at least two articles' discussions in which the flagicon survived. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 19:28, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am attempting to start discussion of this issue at WP biography. – flamurai (t) 21:18, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Responded. :) RadioKirk (u|t|c) 21:29, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I only remove the flags once per day. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 21:40, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LOL... okay... :D RadioKirk (u|t|c) 21:42, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, got it. Perhaps the discussion will firm something up. :) RadioKirk (u|t|c) 21:50, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

I noticed your comment about the Rowley Island article. Sorry for the delay in answering. School's been eating at my free time away like 12-molar sulfuric acid. In any case, I appreciate the work you have done to keep the article vandalism-free. The article's history has exploded since the map was added, most of it being vandalism and the reversion thereof. Clearly there are a lot of immature people with too much extra time on their hands. --CommKing 01:47, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahoihoi

I could suitly emphazi my not hate mail file there, but I'll do it here: it's for stuff that's not hate mail. ^_^ Also, thank you for the free praise. I've been away awhile. Cernen Xanthine Katrena 17:16, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hello! I hope you are feeling fine. I would like you to delete two talkpages from this project as it is being created wrongly. The two pages in question are Talk:Elahly and Talk:Ahlyegypt. On further insight, the contents of these two pages are similiar and the very same content is in the article Al-Ahly. Thank you! --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 17:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

The article Antwerp, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup.

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page.
You have been left this message by PocKleanBot, an automated process that notifies editors that articles to which they may have contributed on more than one occasion in the past now need cleanup. If you have any comments or object to this message being left, please leave a message on PocKleanBot's talk page.

Returned.

Yes, yes, and this time, for real; now that I have high-speed internet, editing this behemoth is much more viable. XD Cernen Xanthine Katrena 12:12, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Links on Angelman Syndrome page

I placed extra links on the bottom of the Angelman Syndrome page Angelman Syndrome to further educate people about Angelman Syndrome and you have removed these links twice. You are correct, Wikipedia isn't a support agency, but it is a resource to help educate the world, of which families are the core constituents.

Please tell me why you are deleting these links?
Do the links further educate people about Angelman Syndrome?
Are the links I posted in breach of the Wikipedia policies?
Why is it that you have permitted certain links and others have been removed?

You say that: "Wikipedia isn't a support agency and should not link to forums", well, I ask you, where does it say that in Wikipedia's list of policies and guidelines? Because, I have searched them and I cannot find one policy in support of your argument.

As an admin, yes, delete spam, bad language, offensive and obscene posts and links to bad websites, but do not delete links to helpful and wholesome information. Aussieland 12:57, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Links have been left now and it looks like you are prepared to leave the issue up for discussion on the relevant discussion page. Thank you. Aussieland 21:36, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brampton Airport

Those coordinates were wrong? They were from the bramfly website. Anyway, is there anyway to get the correct ones to appear both in the table, and up above? Google Earth's released a new layer that uses type of tag that I inserted to dot the map with our articles. I'm going to be talking with the developers (I've got their email from Brad Patrick) and can suggest the next release of the feature scan the whole article for coordinates, not just the top. -- Zanimum 14:44, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kid_Dakota

I understand completely.

However, I feel that Kid Dakota's page didn't necessarily need to be deleted. They are a legitimate band with plenty of notariaty. Yes, the general definition needed some redefining, but that's all really.

I undestand that using my own words is better than copying and pasting. On the other hand I thought it was permissable to do so granted that it was properly documented. I'm not entirely sure I cited my source correctly, but I did cite it.

That having been said, I'm going to, once again, create the Kid Dakota wiki excluding the copied band description. And this time hopefully it won't be immediately deleted.

Smashingparadox 05:44, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT:

I've changed my mind. I don't really feel like typing all that stuff out again. I might do it tomorrow. I might not ever do it. Sorry to waste your time. Smashingparadox 05:57, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re Easypath

Well, maybe, but just because Xilinx has an article doesn't mean their every product or process necessarily rates an article also, and "30% - 70% less expensive than a standard FPGA" would need to some serious cites from respected, verifiable, and neutral sources... sounds spammy to me, but anyway I sent it to AfD to sort it all out. Herostratus 06:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Health Wiki Research

A colleague and I are conducting a study on health wikis. We are looking at how wikis co-construct health information and create communities. We noticed that you are a frequent contributor to Wikipedia on health topics.

Please consider taking our survey here.

This research will help wikipedia and other wikis understand how health information is co-created and used.

We are from James Madison University in Harrisonburg, Virginia. The project was approved by our university research committee and members of the Wikipedia Foundation.

Thanks, --Sharlene Thompson 19:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure?

How can it be a violation if I merely posted some links to the original articles? FP

I was referring to the Centaurs in antiquity. FP

thanks

Hey, I just wanted to thank you for... approving my Kid Dakota article and for fixing the stub. :) Smashingparadox 04:35, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Broadneck High School

I made a few edits to the entry on my high school, and I'm wondering why you edited them back. There is a short list of senior pranks and I added one, as well as changing spelling for correctness. I'm confused as to why you changed these things back. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.2.198.233 (talk) 05:25, 15 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Cordyceps/Vegetable caterpillar spammer vandal.

Could you please look into seeing that the site this... thing promotes finds its way onto the WP:SPAM blacklist? Thank you. E. Sn0 =31337= ^Talk 08:53, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I went to the Wikimedia-wide spam blacklist and based on what I read on the talk page I don't think there is much chance of it getting blacklisted yet. So far the only times the site has been added are from here and here. I also checked out the Search web links page and there's no current links. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 09:07, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah crap; c'est la vie I guess. I've been fighting that spammer on and (mostly off) for a few months; the spam comes from different IPs from one attack run to the next. E. Sn0 =31337= ^Talk 18:32, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK that's different if you've been under attack for months. I forgot to look at the history of the pages and just the IP's of the two spammers. You might have a case. Put together a report on the spamming (with links) and put it on Wikimedia-wide spam blacklist. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 20:43, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I haven't been under attack; the articles have. I'll do so when I get some time. Thanks. E. Sn0 =31337= ^Talk 20:46, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a Wikimedia account. Mind if I construct the report ~~here~~? E. Sn0 =31337= ^Talk 20:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, I'll make a subpage in my sandbox. :) E. Sn0 =31337= ^Talk 20:52, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do have an account over there so if you want me to post it then let me know. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 21:00, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Here is the report. User:E. Sn0 =31337=/sandbox/cordyceps vandal. Note that I've discovered more IPs in the articles' histories than I've personally done battle with. The earlier ones no one bothered with warning; perhaps they couldn't predict how severe this vandal would get? Thank you for your time. :) E. Sn0 =31337= ^Talk 21:16, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done but it looks like they have a long backlog. If you find any more add them to the User:E. Sn0 =31337=/sandbox/cordyceps vandal but don't delete it until after someone looks at the case. I linked to it from there as it was easier than typing it out again. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 21:33, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I plan on keeping it permanently! I saw the backlog; holy fBLEEP! E. Sn0 =31337= ^Talk 21:36, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image the Arms of Sir Robert Bell

Hello, It would be greatly appreciated if you could help me remove several duplicate images. Further, I have recently attempted to revert one of the images and I cant seem to manage having the image displayed at the preferred resolutiuon 500px. I would like to delete the larger 1027 X 1042i image. You helped me long ago when I was just getting started and I have since added a little more content. Please consult the following link Arms of Robert Bell Additionally can you delete the trail of revert errors? Many Thanks Wales 15 December 10:13 (UTC)

Here is a link to the image that should be removed [3]

I do not believe that the image that I would like deleted is currently displayed, however it still can be viewed. I have rechecked the other 500px image, and it now is displayed properly. The image (s)appear in the following articles Sir Robert Bell (Knight~) Holy Grail, Phoenix (mythology), Thank you very much for your help, sincerely, Wales 15 December 11:00 (UTC)

Re: Removal of the image. I am not sure why the image still appears? I have consulted the revert history on the image page and the larger image can still be found 1027x....Just trying to clean up the pages and reduce the data on the servers. Thank you again for your help. 15 December 2006 Wales 11:17 (UTC)

James Armstrong Richardson International Airport

Hi CambridgeBayWeather, the name choice for the new airport in Wininpeg is a little more contrived than that. The official ceremony that was a rushed and slapped-together affair was in reponse to an inadvertent release of the proposed name change for the new terminal complex by a Transport Canada official in a "everybody gets this" email. The name was intended to be released to mark the opening of the new terminal in 2009 but now has been attached to the older building as well. Why do I know this- I got the original email that was sent out by mistake and then sat back to watch the fireworks. LOL Bzuk 13:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

slightly new user :-) looking for help

Hi Alan,

My name is Lidija Davis, I recently put together an entry for "Barbara Coll" also a redirect to that page from "WebMama".

I am sorry to bother you, but am a little unsure about this process, I am not slightly, more very new to this.

You have tagged the article in question as "proposed to be deleted" due to non-notable and advertising.

I would really appreciate your help in working out what I have done incorrectly, I am not sure what non-notable is (having difficulty finding it here) but as for advertising, I was careful not to put too much other than who Coll is. I looked at the entry for "Bruce Clay" when putting this together and I had thought there was not that much difference.

I am not quite sure how you respond to this so I will include my email - lid at techtalkradio dot com dot au, again, any help would be great, and thanks in advance.

Hope today is good to you

Cheers

Lidija Davis —The preceding unsigned comment was added by LidDavis (talk • contribs) 16:38, 15 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

new contributor saying thanks

Hi again,

Thank you for the advice. As much as I love wikipedia (recently wrote an assignment for Berkeley on wiki vs EB - A of course :-)

I am still very new to editing/contributing here, and all advice is so much appreciated. I am off to read what you have suggested and am glad for both your help and purple rains. I found it tricky navigating around the help area (although must admit cheat sheet is good), once I get my head around this I'm thinking of doing a page on "Wiki for Dummies" a type of quick start guide - by yes, the biggest dummy here...

I chose to compile the Barbara Coll page after I heard her speak on the subject of SEO at Google the other night, and found no entry about her on Wikipedia. At the time I thought it smart to include a little about the subject matter - SEO and SEM - that she is known for, yet that was removed. I was wondering why that is so; particularly as I put in very little and linked to other Wiki pages that defined it better. Just another dumb question I guess, but learning is good, and if you have the time, I would love to know the answer.

Thanks again, have a great weekend.

LidDavis 16:09, 16 December 2006 (UTC)Lidija DavisLidDavis 16:09, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Google earth

If concensus is for making the chage proposed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports/Infobox#Google earth, would you bot be able to do the update? Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 14:00, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Responded at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports/Infobox#Google earth. —Mets501 (talk) 16:13, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I sent you an e-mail. Then I noticed that preferred to get messages through this service.

Are you the one who wrote that article on Inuktitut.

It is very good.

I appologize if I cam accross as abrasive. Honestly, I thought the author was someone else. I shouldn't say what I was suspicious about.

I don't speak Inuktitut, but I am writing my dissertation on Inuktitut.

I have some questions about a number of the examples. Does ilisai mean teach or learn, for example? If you want to discuss the issues, I will gladly discuss them with you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wellhellothere (talk • contribs) 18:42, 16 December 2006.

Spam

I just received a message from you asking me not to suggest some relevant external links that I find very useful. I thought this was the point of Wikipedia?

I do not see the issue with the link that I suggested as there are numerous examples of links to websites similar in nature throughout Wikipedia. What sets the links I suggested apart from these other examples? And what gives you the right to call the links I'm suggesting "spam"? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.142.45.180 (talk • contribs) 23:42, 17 December 2006.

I just received a message from you asking me not to suggest some relevant external links that I find very useful. I thought this was the point of Wikipedia?

I do not see the issue with the link that I suggested as there are numerous examples of links to websites similar in nature throughout Wikipedia. What sets the links I suggested apart from these other examples? And what gives you the right to call the links I'm suggesting "spam"? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.142.45.180 (talk • contribs) 00:37, 18 December 2006.

Deletion of Current Aviation Weather external links at CYYR, CYYT and CYHZ airports

Hi, you've deleted the following external links at Goose Bay CYYR, St. John's CYYT, and Halifax CYHZ.

acweather.blogspot.com/2006/09/st.html Current CYYT Aviation Weather
acweather.blogspot.com/2006/09/goose-bay-yyrcyyr-cfb-goose-bay.html Current CYYR Aviation Weather
acweather.blogspot.com/2006/09/halifax-yhzcyhz-halifax-international.html Current Aviation Weather for CYHZ

I'm curious why. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.179.50.129 (talk • contribs) 03:32, 18 December 2006.

They were deleted because they looked like linkspam, if you want to link to a weather site then why not use the source, Environment Canada? CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 03:39, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. Environment Canada is not the source for the AVIATION weather on the webpage. The aviation weather source is the NOAA server for the AVIATION TAF/METAR weather. It's contained by an iframe tag. If you have a clean and easy way to code an iframe tag that contains the TAF METAR information within the wiki-page let me know and I'll change it. There is other information contained on the webpage including a Google Map of the airport and a Airport Technical Information Link. All of this might be of interest to Wiki-users. 68.179.50.129 (talk • contribs)

srry

Insert non-formatted text here I created the jaccard meat tenderizer (recently deleted), but the final product was not my doing. I never inteded it it to be so disgusting. some of the edits could not have been more untruthful. I appologize for my fellow user's immaturity. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WileyCoyotey (talk • contribs) 08:51, December 18, 2006

Airport Collaboration of the Fortnight

You supported First Flight Airport, which has been selected as the Airport WikiProject's new Collaboration of the Fortnight. Please help improve this article to featured article standards. thadius856_{talk|airports|neutrality} 20:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the ... disruption on my page. (Didn't notice it until now, several days later...) --Nlu (talk) 08:47, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for catching the "Indians"->"Natives" revision on Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics; I removed the insertion of the word "European" but didn't even notice that there was another political correctness modification. 129.97.79.144 22:47, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

matt smith is a weiner?

what are you talking about the page did not say that --E tac 10:26, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revert war on article "Vaisala".

The "Vaisala" page has been back and forth half a dozen times recently. What's the problem? You keep claiming a copyright violation and lack of proof of permission. How does one prove permission? Send a note on Company letterhead to every person who edits Wikipedia?

User:Makimant works with me and English is not his first language. I dare say too that his understanding of copyright law is not at the level of an IP lawyer. Can't you cut him some slack and be more helpful than destructive? I *know* you aren't acting on complaints from the copyright holder because I have inside information that permission is indeed granted. (Ah, but how to PROVE it to your satisfaction?)

by Jamoross 2006-12-22

IATA Airport Lists

I saw that the IATA lists for airports are currently uncategorized. I would be glad to tackle this rather simple (but tedious) job, but wanted to get an OK from someone with a better clue than I have on the project. Would Category:IATA airport designator be a good name to create? and then each list would go under List foo | foo in the indexing? --Chrispounds 22:43, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be bold however it is a lot of rework if I mess up. --Chrispounds 15:13, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

why did u delete my user page and talk page?

why? Ph Bot 13:04, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PhBo

Oh! My mistake. Thanks a lot. I thought it was not right for someone to use the word Bot in their username. I was still working my way to find out the innappropriate usernames noticeboard. I guess you saved me the effort. Best regards, Asterion^talk 13:05, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Do you know what did happen to the notice at the top of WP:AN or WP:AN/I informing about this? I seem to remember to have seen it last week. Asterion^talk 13:17, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PhBo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has just been blocked indef. -- Szvest - ^{Wiki me up ®} 14:36, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Minglebox

Why was this article deleted (titled Minglebox) and also from the list of social networking sites?

Delete account history

Hi CambridgeBayWeather,

I'm an ex-wikipedian. I was wondering if you could delete the history on my user page and talk page of my account and lock it up please? (I let slip some personal information in the past and it'll settle my nerves if I know no one will ever see that info). :)

It's here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:EKN

Thanks a bunch 68.232.40.217 18:51, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to log in first so that I can be sure it's you. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 22:19, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, another admin took care of it for me. Thanks anyway. 68.232.40.217 02:51, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

new contributor seeking more help please

Hi,

Thank you for your help a few weeks ago with my first article here about Barbara Coll. I write to you seeking help again please. I am a grad journalism student with a passion for technology and a developing interest in SEO--this is why I began this article.

After your kind advice, I researched Coll quite a bit (days....) and updated the article, in fact was still in the process. I found links to where she was referenced in New York Times and Business Week and believed (after reading the info/links you provided, thank you) that they were great sources.

To show she is an established and well known national speaker, I put in links to where she has spoken around the country and for whom. I also included awards and was in the process of finding information about her education and family. This is largely as my understanding of encyclopedia's is they are to contain all information on a subject.

During the past week, an editor has gone in and removed (argh :-) - (sorry, took me ages..)all my research and is suggesting I put in links to blogs and forums, which I understood are not generally accepted by Wikipedia. He has deleted so much and now the article is listed to be removed again. I do understand the open nature of Wikipedia and as such do not wish to get into any type of "disagreement" with anyone who makes changes but feel I was right in what I had included. I do not want to cause angst to anyone here, and figured you have been here for some time and could potentially guide me a little more please, if you have the time, to make sure I don't annoy anyone and to ensure I do abide by Wikipedia's guidelines. I am sorry to dump this on you but really don't know anyone else who seems to know enough. Any advice is greatly appreciated. Thank you.

LidDavis 17:56, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD that may be of interest

Hi CBW - I'm busily trying to save a stub article from deletion on afd, and given your location, you might be able to add something useful to it, or at least make some comment on the afd... the article in question is Loks Land Island. Cheers, Grutness...wha? 10:50, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Winnipeg article

I am trying to get a peer review of the Winnipeg article. It is probably at the level of B for quality and needs that last extra push to get it to A level. It needs more outside help and advice. Could you assist? I really don't know what I am doing when it comes to making requests in Wikipedia. I am probably doing it all wrong. jdobbin 01:11, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks on looking at the article. I will look at making the request you suggested. jdobbin 15:29, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Andretti

Removed flagicon why? All the other GP driver entries have one, as far as I can see? -- Ian Dalziel 01:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've put it back. I think there is some justification for the flag on a GP driver article, but I don't feel strongly about it - if you want to work through the category and delete all of them, feel free! -- Ian Dalziel 12:59, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kitchen Craft

Also, could you restore Kitchen Craft of Canada Ltd.? I am trying to list all of the major employers in Winnipeg Corporations based in Winnipeg. The speedy deletion caught me off guard and if it needs additional material, I will put in in there are and cite it. I have put some effort into getting the largest businesses in Winnipeg listed. jdobbin 01:34, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian flag in Joni Mitchell article

Hi there. I noticed you replaced the maple leaf flag in the infobox with another, giving the reasoning that the maple leaf flag wasn't in use until 1965. Why would we want to use an outdated flag to represent her birth country? Sam 15:58, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Raipur, India. Factual inaccuracies

There are tremendous factual inaccuracies in the article on the Indian city Raipur. Most notably, population, demographics and unsubstantiated claims. Please fix that as the article ends up being misleading —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.205.60.76 (talk) 23:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Deleted Louis Sauer Pages

Thanks for deleting the duplicate Louis Sauer pages. Its my first time and I made a mistake. Fortunately I'd saved writing I was working on. Cheers, Yvonne —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yvonnert (talk • contribs) 12:57, 30 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]