User talk:Calm As Midnight

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Calm As Midnight}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Calm As Midnight, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Calm As Midnight! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 04:33, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Saying the NATO Bombing Of Yugloslavia inflicted only "Light Damage To The Military" In The Article Is Bias, Misleading And Should Be Removed

It is not a neutral statement and some of the articles I have sourced have suggested major damage was inflicted, despite the errors that were made during the bombings. I referenced articles that provided information on damage to military and civilian infrastructure. The article I sourced from the European Journal of International Law was as neutral as they came and it even had a bibliography from various news articles. Keeping the false information on the article suggests to me that the article is acting political and promoting anti-interventionist propaganda. Wikipedia is not a place for politics and should be neutral at all times.75.72.35.253 (talk) 23:13, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I undid your edits because you repeated the same sentence 2 times.--Calm As Midnight 23:16, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Calm As Midnight! The instructors at the Counter-Vandalism Unit Academy have seen your hard work reverting vandalism, and we would like to thank you. But do you want to go to the next level? Would you like to know how reverts, warnings, reports, blocks, and bans all come together to keep this Encyclopedia free from disruption? Then consider enrolling today! Theo polisme 23:57, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the invitation. I'm going to revert more vandalism then I'll decide if i want to enroll or not.--Calm As Midnight 23:59, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yu Zhengsheng

What was unreliable? Most of the information came from a Reuters article which I referenced in my changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkMurata (talk • contribs) 00:31, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I restored your edit, Because i never noticed those sources.--Calm As Midnight 03:06, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander nubia

Hello, after you tagged, creator added RS. I fixed the reflist. Dloh cierekim 01:50, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kaigas

This stub article has plenty of context, and should not be tagged as CSD A1. If it only said "Kaigas is a period of time", that would be A1. It has other problems, but is not eligible for speedy deletion as lacking context. Please take more care before requesting deletion of articles. PamD 06:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That probably might have fallen under A7.--Calm As Midnight 06:57, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:00, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Calm As Midnight (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

okay, I'm Anderson. I was looking for a clean start, Reverting vandalism and editing articles. I had no intention of going anywhere near the perm pages.--Calm As Midnight 02:49, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please request unblocking on your main account. Tiptoety ^talk 03:25, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Calm As Midnight (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i an not using this account to evade restrictions. This is a clean start account of User:Anderson. I am still following the temporary editing restrictions that were put in place.--Calm As Midnight 21:55, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Er, it doesn't count as a clean start when you wander around Wikipedia talking about and to yourself. One account at a time is how it works, and no disrupting with either account. You've fallen afoul of both of those rules. As Tiptoety says, try requesting unblock on your main account, and try including an explanation of your recent cross-account hijinks. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 21:59, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

I can't do that on the TP of my other account. Because talk page access was disabled for not understanding why i was blocked.--Calm As Midnight 23:16, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for not checking earlier. I have now revoked your access to this talk to match. I suggest you pursue unblocking through WP:BASC if you wish to try again. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 23:22, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Page Curation newsletter

Hey Calm As Midnight. I'm dropping you a note because you used to (or still do!) patrol new pages. This is just to let you know that we've deployed and developed Page Curation, which augments and supersedes Special:NewPages - there are a lot of interesting new features :). There's some help documentation here if you want to familiarise yourself with the system and start using it. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:29, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]