User talk:CaliforniaWave

CaliforniaWave, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi CaliforniaWave! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Mario Cerrito. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. A.Minkowiski (talk) 16:44, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 December 8, you may be blocked from editing. McGeddon (talk) 09:38, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion notices

Hi, the notice I removed from Deadly Gamble was a WP:PROD notice that is allowed to be removed but the current notice is for WP:AFD which is not allowed to be removed by anyone until the outcome of keep or delete or merge etc. is made at the AFD, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:55, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MikePlant1, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

McGeddon (talk) 12:16, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:52, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]