Jump to content

User talk:California-View

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hi California-View, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Good luck, and have fun. --Cornell Rockey 18:40, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal edits in article "Official"

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Official. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. - Mamyles (talk) 04:18, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

to Reply to Mamyles who has falsely accused me of vandalism on the page Official. Mamyles may not like the facts surrounding the media and how they deceive their audience but that's his/her opinion.

  • Whether or not that was vandalism is debatable, but you shouldn't use Wikipedia as a soapbox. What you added to that article was your opinion, not anything based on reliable sources, and it was hardly neutral. Huon (talk) 06:42, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Unfortunately claims of such low quality of modern press are tricky to support in an encyclopedia and require thorough research into existing literature; you may be interested in participating in Wikinews, a sister project focusing on publishing neutral, entertaining news without bias (this is done through volunteer-driven writing and reviewing). (For the specific point you were trying to make, a search on "government official usage" or similar at scholar.google.com could be useful, but I didn't find anything. The term is broad, and blaming modern press for being vague in an encyclopedia would require evidence collected as a result of thorough linguistic and fact-check work to support the claim.) Gryllida (talk) 07:03, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Huon better described what I was trying to bring attention to. I recognize that you did not intend to cause disruption, so vandalism is not the best descriptor. My apologies for the over-reaction. It may be helpful to read WP:ISNOT and WP:POV, as reference to avoid this perception. Wish you the best in future edits! Mamyles (talk) 03:49, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Protest songs in the United States may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • articulation."<ref>[{{Allmusic|class=album|id=r703579/review|pure_url=yes}} allmusic ((( Real Gone > Review )))<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> Waits' recent output has not only addressed the
  • url= http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjNJmwwf7QA | title= Green Day- Wake Me Up When September Ends (HQ! Official Video| publisher = www.greenday}}</ref> <ref>{{cite web | last= | first= | url= http:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:32, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BracketBot Thanks for correcting. Your technical expertise is very much valued on Wikipedia. California-View (talk) 22:32, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

[edit]

Re Timeline of congressional elections sucks - the way to address your concern would be by posting at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:38, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]