User talk:Calia8888

Welcome!

Hello, Calia8888, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Shalir Salim (talk) 20:36, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Thanks a million!

Next question...I am trying to link two pages, one in English and an earlier German page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diatribe_Records and https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diatribe_Recordings

Please advise! ;-)

Calia8888 (talk) 18:59, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll say right from the start that WP:REFB is a much more comprehensive page on how to edit references. Now, on to your question.

References are placed on the page between ref tags; <ref>This is a reference</ref>. Editing a reference is as easy as finding that reference on the page (it will be in the body of the text) and changing what's inside the ref tags. REFB has more information about easily adding references and some of the more complex syntax of referencing. If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 19:16, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(e/c) Since I was composing an answer that is now partially redundant by the edit conflict, I am providing one aspect of what I think may be the problem, by posting a canned answer through a template below that may help clear up an issue of understanding you're having:

When you are reading an article and see a references section near the bottom populated by a series of numbered citations, you might think that if you edit the page, you will see those citations typed in that section and be able to edit them. However, normally what you will see is markup similar to this:

==References==

{{reflist}} or <references />

The text of citations is actually in the body of the article, directly next to statements or paragraphs the citations support, using <ref>...</ref> tags, which display as Footnotes (e.g.^[1]^[2]) when you are reading an article. The template code shown above in the references section collates and displays all of the citations within the article in a numbered list in which the numbers correspond to the footnote numbers in the text. By clicking on the ^{^} symbol next to a citation display, you can easily find exactly where in the body of the article the citation text appears in order to edit it. For more, please see Help:Referencing for beginners.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 19:20, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Diatribe Records has been reverted.
Your edit here to Diatribe Records was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://cmcireland.wordpress.com/2012/11/01/tronic-one-launch/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:13, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Thanks! :-)

I am trying to link two pages, one in English and an earlier German page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diatribe_Records and https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diatribe_Recordings

Please advise! ;-)

Thanks)

Please help me with...

Calia8888 (talk) 12:20, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did that for you. --Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 14:29, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nick Roth (composer) (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is inadequately referenced, and does not explain why this composer is notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nick Roth (composer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:52, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Calia8888, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:52, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nick Roth (composer)

Hello, Calia8888. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Nick Roth (composer), for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Nick Roth (composer) to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Kavdiamanju (talk) 19:31, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]