I see you're new to Wikipedia. When you first start editing there's a steep learning curve and it's not best to start off by dumping a wall of text into an article. Further, your username indicates your political leaning and you shouldn't be editing where you have a conflict of interest. Please discuss your interest on Talk:American Legislative Exchange Council where you can help determine what the consensus is for the content you'd like to add. Chris Troutman (talk)20:49, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I know of no official entity that holds the string of letters I use as my username. If you know of an organization named or owns "calexit" as a trademark, please inform me as I certainly wouldn't want to violate any laws.
Neither my political leaning nor yours (even though I can clearly see this image on your profile)sandra bullock, she co-authored a ban! should have anything to do in this matter. What I've written about was simple reporting of events as they were reported on sources accepted by WP.
What we are supposed to be discussing is that all views weren't included. The place which has viewpoints would be the last paragraph and it contained two quotes from the hypothetical adversaries to make sure it stays neutral. Be specific.
Hi Calexit! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of websites and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Specifically needs independent third party sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cloudbleed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Hello! Calexit,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KGirlTrucker81huh?what I've been doing17:41, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Your submission at Articles for creation: Cloudbleed (February 24)
Your improvements were sufficient, and your article has been accepted. I asked an admin to move it to mainspace over a stub already present as it was far more comprehensive. Please let us know if you have any questions. Waggie (talk) 18:30, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
