User talk:Caledonia45

Welcome!

Hello, Caledonia45, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Venustas 12 (talk) 20:09, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Gary McHale. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Specifically, terms like "agitator" must be backed up by reliable sources, per the biographies of living people guidelines. —C.Fred (talk) 18:03, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to Gary McHale. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Chzz ► 20:45, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Gary McHale. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Wayne Olajuwon chat 20:48, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 20:54, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I provided full citations for the revisions provided. Why is it that you are afraid of providing a balanced version? The updates I provided were all sourced from valid and respected news agencies - why are you so afraid of the truth? And do you really think blocking someone will stop such things - Ideas are more powerful than that. Your blocking game is as silly as you are, child. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Caledonia45 (talk • contribs)

Your pattern of edits showed a reluctance to follow Wikipedia guidelines, including the three revert rule, which you clearly violated at Gary McHale. Had you engaged in discussion at the talk page about the changes to the article, you might have been able to get consensus to form to change the article. However, you have been blocked, and based on your above comment, you intend to continue disruptive the article. Accordingly, the indefinite block is warranted. —C.Fred (talk) 21:15, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]