User talk:Calebwood2/sandbox

1. First, what does the article-draft do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? Caleb did a good job of presenting his article and providing a definition. Personally, my attention was drawn to the way he added links to other articles in his sentences making his draft more interesting. 2. Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything off-topic? Everything Caleb wrote is on-point on what he is trying to edit. 3. Does the article focus too much on negative or positive information? Explain. The information Caleb uses is direct to the point, not showing either a lot of positive or negatives. 4. Does the article draw conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view? Are most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, such as textbooks and journal articles? Or do they rely on blogs or self-published authors? His draft just defines what Shawarma is and its origin, he doesn't try to convince the reader to pick a side. All of his sources are reliable coming from books and journals. 5. Are there any changes you would suggest the author apply to the article? Why? Right now no, because I want to see what else Caleb is going to add to his edition. 6. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know! Not really, both of our articles are completely different, but probably I can add more links to my edition.

Mauricio PerezMauricio Perez Gonzalez (talk) 01:28, 29 October 2019 (UTC)