User talk:Calde

Taiwanese Culture

The lede is VERY well sourced. I moved the tag below the lede. I expect this page will be seeing great changes in the coming weeks and the current material will not even be on the page.Maowang 01:13, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you like to copy edit, Taiwanese Aborigines is at FAC looking for anyone with the guts ;) to read through and either oppose or support it.

Battle of Red Cliffs is looking for copy edits.

Taiwanese People could use some new blood.

Just some suggestionsMaowang 01:49, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whoah! You seem to be raising some very "radical" issues for a user who has only been, according to your contribution log, on Wikipedia for a day or two. Slow down fireball.Maowang 03:20, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should read my user page. --Calde 04:22, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who were you before? What was your prior login name or IP#? Maowang 04:26, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's none of your business. My objections on the FAC page should be judged on their own merits, not on my history at Wikipedia. --Calde 04:27, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rate on quality scale

Hi, I am working on Taiwanese opera and trying to expand it.I saw you are also interested about this topic.if you think what needs to add in this article. Please give me some comments.I would like to ask you to watch that article and rate on the scope of Wikiproject Taiwan or give me some opinions or comments on this article. Thanks Qwaszxfish (talk) 04:45, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is in the community interest to know your history with Wikipedia, sockpuppet status, history of conflict and resolution, edit history...etc. I am getting the impression you are a sockpuppet and if you are, that violoates Wiki-policy and good faith. If you are not, I apologize, but there is no record of you before yesterday.Maowang 04:36, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppets are not a violation so long as they are not used to circumvent Wikipedia policy, such as by subverting 3RR or avoiding ArbCom sanctions. If you think I may be doing that, you are free to present your evidence and ask for a checkuser. --Calde 04:46, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The concern would be whether or not you have contributed to the project or whether you have ever been in conflict with either of the editors involved in nominating this or any other page, which could bias your response and make you ineligable to vote. Because you claim to be a prior editor with no editing history, it can not be determined if you are acting under a false pretense.