User talk:CalOtter/Archives/2019/March
This is an archive of past discussions about User:CalOtter. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
More about your opinion about non constructive
You are quick to pull the trigger, I just wrote what you reverted. You might want to sit on something for a bit before making assumptions. That lead was way too long, and not about Dumas himself. The para I took out is repeated word for word immediately following in Early Life, where it belongs. You should "improve, not revert". Knee Jerk Reverting is what starts edit wars. 184.69.174.194 (talk) 02:38, 8 March 2019 (UTC) Stop watching that page and let the WIKI process unfold as it should. Your words are not the final say.
- You are right. I mistakenly believed that it was vandalism. I shouldn't have reverted your edit. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! CalOtter (talk) 03:02, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
- Thankyou. I'm impressed. I have made mistakes too in my life. cheers Ben 184.69.174.194 (talk) 03:41, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Rollback granted
Hi CalOtter. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:41, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
From D2 movie article
Loud, clear and not such nice in message: Screw you and screw that meaningless, trashy, barbaric, stinky, totalitarian (non-democratic) non-constructive etc. rule, darn, non-constructive, stinky, lousy etc. idiot/ts! Be afraid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.168.124.141 (talk) 00:57, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
From Fuddle Duddle
re. "Hello, I'm CalOtter. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Fuddle duddle, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so!" This is my personal experience; i owned the t-shirt, as did a couple friends, and i remember a poster as well. What i cannot remember is the artist- it might have been an Aislin editorial, but that might have been a bit risque for the Montreal Gazette at the time. But i do not think there IS any aporpriate citation..... but that does not make it false information, nor does it necessarily mean it should be removed altogether. However, i'm just a Goblim, you are one of the Overseers of Wikipedia, what do i know. Thanks for messaging me in any event. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.90.99.60 (talk) 01:52, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to WP:STiki!
Hello, CalOtter, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 20:51, 25 March 2019 (UTC) |
Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.
The Signpost: 31 March 2019
- From the editors: Getting serious about humor
- News and notes: Blackouts fail to stop EU Copyright Directive
- In the media: Women's history month
- Discussion report: Portal debates continue, Prespa agreement aftermath, WMF seeks a rebranding
- Featured content: Out of this world
- Arbitration report: The Tides of March at ARBCOM
- Traffic report: Exultations and tribulations
- Technology report: New section suggestions and sitewide styles
- News from the WMF: The WMF's take on the new EU Copyright Directive
- Recent research: Barnstar-like awards increase new editor retention
- From the archives: Esperanza organization disbanded after deletion discussion
- Humour: The Epistolary of Arthur 37
- In focus: The Wikipedia SourceWatch
- Special report: Wiki Loves (50 Years of) Pride
- Community view: Wikipedia's response to the New Zealand mosque shootings