User talk:Cakelikemichael

Nomination of Ryan Dizon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan Dizon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Dizon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tutelary (talk) 00:18, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinking

Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.

I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

dates
years
commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

(This even applies to infoboxes.)

Thanks, and my best wishes.

Tony (talk) 07:53, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Ryan Dizon. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 21:57, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ryan Dizon, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Stop blanking the article. It is in an AfD. Let it run it's course. reddogsix (talk) 22:00, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]