User talk:CafeDelKevin

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, CafeDelKevin! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Marek.69 ^talk 03:01, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Let me also add my welcome. I want to explain why I reverted your changes to Empire of Vietnam. Please note the British spellings are not spelling errors. Different variations of English are accepted in Wikipedia. Please see WP:ENGVAR. Also, it is incorrect to link dates without a good reason (see WP:MOSUNLINKDATES). Thanks. Ground Zero | t 03:30, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He put organiser instead of organizer. He also put Vietnamise instead of Vietnamese. I doubt it's a Britishism, since Mozilla Firefox said it was a spelling error (and it should have both American and European spellings).--CafeDelKevin (talk) 04:31, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Organiser" is correct English. So is "Vietnamise" in the sense of "render Vietnamese" (a verb). Esoglou (talk) 08:34, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why use British English? America is better and it has more people that speak it so it would only make sense to make it so the largest number of people can understand it (American).--CafeDelKevin (talk) 14:55, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Americans may say US usage is better. English would say it is not better. So would Australians. So would Indian English-speakers. So would ... For the rules in Wikipedia (which is neutral on the question of which, if any, is best), see WP:ENGVAR. Esoglou (talk) 18:04, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice try, Xgmx

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 21:53, 23 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

I beg your pardon?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CafeDelKevin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Under what basis?

Decline reason:

Per checkuser evidence. Email functionaries-enlists.wikimedia.org to appeal your block. NW (Talk) 02:48, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.