User talk:Caeruleancentaur
|
June 2008
[edit]
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. Slashme (talk) 12:33, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi Centaur, I left a response to your remark on the Talk page referred to above. Thanks for your input, Drmies (talk) 17:31, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- I've done some work on the Juan Diego section, and have incorporated your remarks and reference. Have a look to see what you think. Drmies (talk) 18:31, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Hey Centaur, perhaps you feel like going over Juan? There are some tags in that article, perhaps you are able to address some of those concerns. BTW, I left you a few messages on the Miracle of the roses talk page a while ago. Thanks, and feliz navidad, Drmies (talk) 17:14, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your correction, I'm foreigner, I do my best to write into a correct English, but help is always welcome ! Yug (talk) 13:09, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'm glad to help out. Let me know if you need this kind of help in the future. Caeruleancentaur (talk) 14:00, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- Umh, if you still have energy, I recently wrote China in Africa... using the same Frenglish... ò.O This article is well sourced, so I hope it will get the Feature article within the next 6 month. Some users already corrected some sections, if you can correct-reword one section, that would be helpful. After, let others do the others. Yug (talk) 15:35, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Grand place
[edit]I've pondered it a little, and I have some answers for you at Talk:Grand Place. Oreo Priest talk 04:24, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Hortative
[edit]Hi,
I've reverted your edits to this page, not necessarily because they were wrong, but because the changes you've made don't follow linguistic standards. Mainly your use of single and double quotation marks is out of line with standard notation, especially in referring to foreign roots like Latin words. Also, some of the changes you'd made to the Latin examples were incorrect as a slight change in form can have a major effect on the meaning of the original Latin. Finally a few of your rewords change the meaning or reference from a linguistic standpoint and while at first glance this is not very important, from a research standpoint it could have major implications. That said, there were a few corrections you'd made such as capitalization and such that would improve the article. I encourage you to consider a more conservative edit along these lines but without the aforementioned changes which were detrimental to the quality of the page. Drew.ward (talk) 04:30, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Thank you
[edit]
|
The Modest Barnstar | |
| Thanks for your recent contributions! -Mike Restivo (talk) 19:55, 29 April 2011 (UTC) |
about Spanish peseta
[edit]I think what you did was more than a minor edit, but no matter. You still missed some &
About dates - I usually write them as {{date|date}} because I think that will cause the date to be presented in local (i.e. user's) format.
John of Cromer in China (talk) mytime= Tue 10:34, wikitime= 02:34, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
A minor edit? Click on the blue words next to the tick box, or look at Help:Minor edit.
There are still two ampersands in line 141 and one in line 142.
My point is that you changed a value in line 184. Only a correction I think, but I think it should have been highlighted.
John of Cromer in China (talk) mytime= Tue 12:24, wikitime= 04:24, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Tripura
[edit]I have undone your recent edit at Tripura, changing "North East" to "Northeast". The article is currently undergoing copy edit in preparation for a resubmission for featured article status. As the article is written in British English, the British form, "North East" is appropriate—in fact, it would probably fail on the featured article criteria if it was written "Northeast", which is the form used in American English. To reach featured article status, the whole article must use one national variation of English consistently. I know it's only a minor thing in itself, but I thought you were owed an explanation for why such a seemingly trivial matter had been reverted. Skinsmoke (talk) 17:56, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Heraldry and Vexillology project
[edit]Greetings! I have requested commentary from members of the heraldry and vexillology project at WT:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology#Current direction of the HV project. Please comment there. Thank you! Wilhelm Meis (☎ Diskuss | ✍ Beiträge) 18:11, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
January 2014
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Saint Nino may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- [[Hripsime]], under the leadership of St. Gayane, who preached Christianity in the Armenian Kingdom]]. But they were persecuted and beheaded by King Tiridates. All 37 of the virgins weere soon
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:17, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 18
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Skete, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint Macarius. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Caeruleancentaur. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |