User talk:Cadline

Welcome!

Hello, Cadline, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Hobartimus (talk) 23:35, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Cadline

A tag has been placed on Cadline requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Dori (Talk • Contribs) 00:04, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with ARCHLine

Hello. Concerning your contribution, ARCHLine, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, ARCHLine appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. ARCHLine has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:ARCHLine and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:ARCHLine with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:ARCHLine.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. TomStar81 (Talk) 00:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Your Message

It does not matter. The bottom line is that the article was copied and pasted from a website which was a copyright symbol at the bottom. As long as the master web page has a copyright notice no material from the web page can be posted here on wikipedia without being sighted, reverted, or deleted. If you want to recreate the article, look at the other website articles here on Wikipedia and move to adopt there style. TomStar81 (Talk) 23:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bad news

As much as I hate do this, I see that you username mirrors and article that you wrote for advertisement purposes. As a result, I am going to have to block this account from any further editing here on Wikipedia. See WP:SPAMNAME for more info on the reason for this block. The template below explains the method to appeal this block. TomStar81 (Talk) 23:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This account, Cadline, has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because your username does not meet our username policy.

This is often not a reflection on the user, and you are encouraged to choose a new account name which does meet our guidelines and are invited to contribute to Wikipedia under an appropriate username. If you feel this block was made in error, you may quickly and easily appeal it—see below.

Our username policy provides guidance on selecting your username. In brief, usernames should not be offensive, disruptive, promotional, related to a 'real-world' group or organization, or misleading. Also, usernames may not end with the string "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

If you have already made edits and wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name you may request a change in username. To do so, please follow these directions:

Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. This is possible because even when you are blocked, you can still edit your own talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note, you may only request a name that is not already in use. The account is created upon acceptance – do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change since we can far more easily allocate your new name to you, if it is not yet used. Usernames that have already been taken are listed here. For more information, please visit Wikipedia:Changing username.
In the alternative, you can "abandon" the contributions under this username and create a new account, which is much faster and easier.

Last, the automated software systems that prevent vandalism may have been activated, which can cause new account creation to be blocked also. If you have not acted in a deliberately inappropriate manner, please let us know if this happens, and we will deactivate the block as soon as possible. You may also appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below or emailing the administrator who blocked you.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cadline (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not want to go against the wikipedia rules, and please help me to have the same information page as all of my competitors can have in Wikipedia. It is democratic I suppose. See Graphisoft, Nemetschek, Autodesk and so on... Best regards, Zoltan Toth Managing Director Cadline kft.

Decline reason:

Using Wikipedia for promotion of your company is against the rules. Since you indicate you wish to continue advertising for your company, I cannot unblock you at this time. See WP:ADVERT. Jayron32.talk.contribs 12:19, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

explanation

If you provide an email address I can explain what's the problem what you did wrong etc (you can add an email address in the "my preferences section"). You should not ask for further unblock requests as it was already denied. First thing if you want to figure out yourself, where you should start is reading the suggested links WP:ADVERT WP:SPAMNAME, then also WP:NOTABILITY Hobartimus (talk) 13:36, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]