User talk:CabriniGreenChicago

Welcome!

Hello, CabriniGreenChicago! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! House1090 (talk) 00:22, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

October 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Ana Alicia, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop this. There are no sources that call her Mexican or Mexican-American. She is a Mexican immigrant to the US at age 6. The infobox parameter is for nationality, not ethnicity; ethnicity was deprecated from the infobox years ago. MB 22:58, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MarnetteD|Talk 21:15, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please note

CGC this violates WP:CANVASS and can cause problems for you. As yet you still have not joined the discussion on the talk page for the article. You need to find some evidence in a WP:SECONDARY reliable source about her citizenship (not her ethnicity) and post it on her talk page for others to assess. I can tell this is important to you but Wikipedia does have policies and guidelines that need to be followed. Please try and understand that. MarnetteD|Talk 22:45, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AYAOTD country source

Hello, I'm Andrzejbanas. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. See WP:RS/IMDb for more info. Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:06, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.. Please discuss on the talk page before adding your sources again. Art of the Title is not a high quality source. Andrzejbanas (talk) 08:05, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not use sources which pull information from IMDb. See WP:RS/IMDb for more information. If you have any questions, i'll be happy to answer them for you! Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:47, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. You have re-added unsourced material to the Amityville 3 article a few times now. You'll need sources to actually state the Mexican production company, not just sources that are pulling information from IMDb. Again, I want you to be able to contribute so please discuss before re-adding sources from junky fan-sources or databases that don't state how their information is gathered. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. MarnetteD|Talk 03:48, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Emiliogogo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:00, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CabriniGreenChicago (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have logged into my Wikipedia account and was surprised to find that I have been blocked. The reason indicates being a sock puppet of another user. I have been confused with a vandal account or something similar. I ask the most experienced editors to review my case, and fix this misunderstanding. I am on Wikipedia for the sole purpose of correcting misinformation or adding missing information. I have made my edits after searches that check my edit, I have added references and I do not vandalize any article. The articles of my interest are mainly cinematographic. I want to continue editing pages that need it, all with the established rules. I reiterate that there is an error and I ask that it be unlocked, please.

Decline reason:

Please don't open multiple requests: it does nothing to advance your cause in any way. MER-C 18:44, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CabriniGreenChicago (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have logged into my Wikipedia account and was surprised to find that I have been blocked. The reason indicates being a sock puppet of another user. I have been confused with a vandal account or something similar. I ask the most experienced editors to review my case, and fix this misunderstanding. I am on Wikipedia for the sole purpose of correcting misinformation or adding missing information. I have made my edits after searches that check my edit, I have added references and I do not vandalize any article. The articles of my interest are mainly cinematographic. I want to continue editing pages that need it, all with the established rules. I reiterate that there is an error and I ask that it be unlocked, please. I request that my case be reviewed by the user Ser Amantio di Nicolao, who has gained notoriety for his active edits and from whom I have learned based on his edit history.

Decline reason:

Closing as stale, you may make a fresh request. 331dot (talk) 12:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.